Detective Conan Files 801-803 Discussion Thread: Domestic Vi

Forum reserved for discussing specific points of the story—mostly from the manga. Be warned, these discussions will be current with the manga and will spoil many plot lines for anime-centric fans.
Post Reply

Who is Bourbon?

Okiya Subaru
14
10%
Amuro Tooru who is not Scar Akai
18
13%
Masumi Sera
5
3%
Scar Akai who is not Amuro Tooru
2
1%
Scar Akai aka Amuro Tooru
87
60%
Conan
2
1%
sstimson
16
11%
 
Total votes: 144
Kor
Administrator

Posts:
3051

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by Kor »

Hahaha funny-let's-not-continue-down-that-road-please-thank-you-moving-on

(Not trying to be mean here  :P We just don't encourage those subjects of discussions since it usually goes down to very eh....weird discussions)
Conan324 wrote: well i dont know if its been mention but file 800 proved that bourbon is real agent and not a fake one as many have suggested.
Many suggested that? When did that happen? I recall sstimson giving that possibility first and later you created a thread with the same theory. Only sstimson, though, has continued with that theory. But even from the start, aside from some individuals, I don't remember that theory being too popular among the fans.
Image
User avatar
sonoci
Everyone's Child

Posts:
1548

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sonoci »

ten wrote:
sonoci wrote: But another connection Sera has to Akai is now they've both been accused of being a Shota/Lolicon (respectively)
Ahh good catch. I remembered Haibara saying that previously, but I completely forgot it was in reference to Akai.

Those bags under the eyes must give off the "creepy" pedophile vibe .. lol
To be honest, I was actually waiting for that catch rather than I just went and caught it xD That lolicon moment was one of my favorites and as soon as Sera started acting all friendly with Conan I kept praying "Ai, make a Shotacon joke. That'd be such a subtle hint, you don't even know"

EDIT: sorry Kor xD But you RM'd me so I'll just leave it at the above (and I totally understand what you mean, I just wanted the joke...nothing more  :| *doesn't enjoy...those type of topics*)


...wait Bourbon is a "real agent" theory? ...what does that even mean? Is that referring to the whole "Bourbon doesn't exist" theory?
Image
sstimson
Everyone a Critic

Posts:
2588
Contact:

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sstimson »

I know this might be going no where, but I am going to point it out anyway. Two things 1) just because Vermouth is talking to Bourbon does not mean they are BO. I currently think if they are, then they are likely to be Kir's Contact with the CIA, aka a mole in the BO and yes a real agent, but an CIA one. 2) It is possible that Vermouth knowing something big is about to happen with the BO and want to keep Conan and company safe. She might have called in either a PI or bodyguard type and give him a code name of Bourbon. There are more reason then Bourbon being BO, as to why Vermouth might be calling him that. Also remember like I posted there is a huge difference between GIN calling Bourbon, as he seem to only deal with Bo agent or people that the BO deal with, and Vermouth who has divided loyalties calling some one Bourbon as she is a lot less likely to be doing BO things and maybe started the pebble rolling down the hill that might start the rock slide that brings down the BO. I think having a open mind when looking at things like that phone call, will allow other possibilities. And while I will not say this for certain, all of those three looking and acting like they are on a phone call does not mean that any of them are the one that Vermouth called. Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?
Last edited by sstimson on December 23rd, 2011, 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Later

Invisible Member
Spoiler: SS Present from PT
Image
User avatar
RALFGTS
Open Your Eyes

Posts:
7

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by RALFGTS »

It's too complicated. And another Bourbon guy?



About the end of the previous case:
It's not a time to answer your mother calls or something, so whoever called each of them(Sera, Amuro, Okiya) was a big deal.
God, I hope they are all good guys, because Sera and Okiya leave that kind of an impression, and it's too early for Amuro to be the bad guy(he was in 9-10 chapters).

*again, sorry for my english.
Last edited by RALFGTS on December 23rd, 2011, 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Immerse your soul in love

*Sorry for my english. I've learned it just by reading manga/watching dramas*
User avatar
sonoci
Everyone's Child

Posts:
1548

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sonoci »

sstimson wrote: ...Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?
...I can't speak for anyone else naturally, but at the very least in my case it "hurts to open the mind to other possibilities" when those "other possibilities" end with something so close to insulting at the end. There's also the fact that, no matter how convincing, until a theory is proven with solid evidence in the canon material it is pretty much just an opinion. Opinions can agree, everyone has seen it before - "I think Okiya is Bourbon" "Oh! Me too!" - but they shouldn't be forced onto other people - "I think Okiya is Bourbon" "I don't" "Pft, does it really hurt that much to open your mind to a good theory? Loosen up, agree with me"

To be honest, your theory is pretty complicated and drawn out, but until that last question I viewed it as harmless, fair theory. After all, people can think what they want, it doesn't affect me... until that question, of course, because then it became a case of "Geez, you're (the reader) so close-minded that you can't even open up to possibilities. Loosen up."

In short, I viewed your points like so:
"This is what I think (fair, it's an opinion)
This is what I think (fair, it's an opinion)
This is what I think (fair, it's an opinion)
This is what I think (fair, it's an opinion)
If you don't think like this, you're close-minded (what, this is telling me what I am, how does a personal insult fit with a theory?)"

Of course, and I'll say again, maybe it's just me.

AN. Y. WAY.

There's only a week or so 'til the next file~ I'm so excited. I'm not sure how things will play out, but I'm almost 100% certain that the same layout of this opening file will hold all the way through. The case seems to be almost a cakewalk, what with one suspect who's already lacking an alibi, so looking for evidence and conversing with the police shouldn't take that many pages. Therefore I think we'll have some more moments from the Sera/Ran/Sonoko end of the table and maybe get some more Scar Akai. Heck, maybe Ran already has some photo albums and after the SA sighting she decided to hang at the agency after all.

Of course, maybe the case will be more complicated than I'm thinking and will take up the whole file. But I can hope, can't I? xD
Image
User avatar
unclesporkums
The one you'd never suspect...

Posts:
387
Contact:

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by unclesporkums »

AMEN!!
sonoci wrote: Of course, maybe the case will be more complicated than I'm thinking and will take up the whole file. But I can hope, can't I? xD
Same here!
"Let's decide once and for all, Vermouth! No more hide-and-seek!!" - Conan Edogawa

Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/unclesporkums?feature=mhee
Deviantart: http://drmuttonchops3.deviantart.com/
Tumblr: http://unclesporkums.tumblr.com/
User avatar
Commi-Ninja

Posts:
1583

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by Commi-Ninja »

unclesporkums wrote: AMEN!!
That is EXACTLY what I thought after reading sonoci's post. :-X
3DS FC: 4699-5851-2068
I might wake up early and go running. I also might wake up and win the lottery. The odds are about the same.
User avatar
Incomplete-tantei
"No Pain, No Gain."

Posts:
359

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by Incomplete-tantei »

sonoci wrote: There's only a week or so 'til the next file~ I'm so excited. I'm not sure how things will play out, but I'm almost 100% certain that the same layout of this opening file will hold all the way through. The case seems to be almost a cakewalk, what with one suspect who's already lacking an alibi, so looking for evidence and conversing with the police shouldn't take that many pages. Therefore I think we'll have some more moments from the Sera/Ran/Sonoko end of the table and maybe get some more Scar Akai. Heck, maybe Ran already has some photo albums and after the SA sighting she decided to hang at the agency after all.

Of course, maybe the case will be more complicated than I'm thinking and will take up the whole file. But I can hope, can't I? xD
Indeed, that would be damn too good if something like this were to happen '^^

Anyway, I was just wondering what is the break on Dec 28th about? I know it's out context but I just wanted to know, since I didn't get the info.
User avatar
sonoci
Everyone's Child

Posts:
1548

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sonoci »

Incomplete-tantei wrote: Anyway, I was just wondering what is the break on Dec 28th about? I know it's out context but I just wanted to know, since I didn't get the info.
Well, the spoilers for chapters usually start come out about 5 days or so before the release date (in this case, if there were no break on the 28th, there would've been spoilers today). The next release date is January 4th IIRC so the spoilers will start to come out around the 31st if everything is "on schedule"
Image
sstimson
Everyone a Critic

Posts:
2588
Contact:

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sstimson »

All I asked was "Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?"

Why did you take it wrong? I never said you had to think one way or the other

And my last statement was nothing more then a question, no a judgement, a question.

one that for anyone could have answered for themselves as "no , but i decided to think this way."

Please no offense was ever meant. Is there a better way to ask that question?

please explain how a question I asked got you thinking that way:
If you don't think like this, you're close-minded (what, this is telling me what I am, how does a personal insult fit with a theory?)
I never said or meant your above. Am I a whipping boy to always be thought of as bad and too crazy so I need to be attacked like that? That everyone have a right to attack me when I try ever much to avoid attacking or saying you must think this way. Where in the past, have I ever said something like you think this way or your a fool?
Others however seem to enjoy crushing me and in between the line are tell me" since you think the way you do, you are a fool and are to be treated as such?

Is it right for others to demonize me like that, when to the best of my remembering, I never done that?

And I am taking a wait and see approach. I do not plan on jumping over the possible cliff just yet.
Later

Invisible Member
Spoiler: SS Present from PT
Image
User avatar
Incomplete-tantei
"No Pain, No Gain."

Posts:
359

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by Incomplete-tantei »

sonoci wrote:
Incomplete-tantei wrote: Anyway, I was just wondering what is the break on Dec 28th about? I know it's out context but I just wanted to know, since I didn't get the info.
Well, the spoilers for chapters usually start come out about 5 days or so before the release date (in this case, if there were no break on the 28th, there would've been spoilers today). The next release date is January 4th IIRC so the spoilers will start to come out around the 31st if everything is "on schedule"
Yup, I know about the date of the spoilers and such, but I wanna know what is the break about?
User avatar
unclesporkums
The one you'd never suspect...

Posts:
387
Contact:

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by unclesporkums »

Incomplete-tantei wrote: Yup, I know about the date of the spoilers and such, but I wanna know what is the break about?
I believe next issue is a double one with twice as many manga in it. A break ususally comes before that if I'm not mistaken.

YAY! My 100th post here!
"Let's decide once and for all, Vermouth! No more hide-and-seek!!" - Conan Edogawa

Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/unclesporkums?feature=mhee
Deviantart: http://drmuttonchops3.deviantart.com/
Tumblr: http://unclesporkums.tumblr.com/
User avatar
sonoci
Everyone's Child

Posts:
1548

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sonoci »

Incomplete-tantei wrote: Yup, I know about the date of the spoilers and such, but I wanna know what is the break about?
Oh whoops, sorry, misunderstood the question xD'''

I'm guessing Shonen Sunday is having a Christmas break

@unclesporkums: Congrats on your 100th post! \o/
sstimson wrote: All I asked was "Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?"

Why did you take it wrong? I never said you had to think one way or the other
I'll be straight here: you can never ask this bolded question. Or at least, IMO, you shouldn't. The reason why: First, no one can explain it. Every person thinks differently. For instance, I could ask why you took that "Mr. Tonic" joke wrong in the Funny Captions thread, but it wouldn't get anywhere. Second, you made no effort to explain that you meant no harm by that question. It was just thrown on the end of your theory. The internet does not have an emotion button: you need to explain yourself any time there is the possibility of being taken insultingly.

Third: At the very end of my reply, I put "Of course, and I'll say again, maybe it's just me." That was my way of saying: "Hey, maybe I'm just looking at it wrong". Your answer is right there, even before you asked the question.
sstimson wrote: And my last statement was nothing more then a question, no a judgement, a question.
"Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?" It's a question, yeah, but that doesn't stop it from being insulting. You don't go and ask someone "Is it really that hard to diet to stop being overweight?" That's a question right there and it's heinous. A question does not equal innocence, especially from someone I assume to be an adult. Children ask questions because they're learning about the world, trying to understand. But if an adult asks a question, sometimes it's not because they want to know something, sometimes it's used as an insult.

Maybe you didn't mean anything, but the way it was worded made me misinterpret the meaning and it felt insulting not only to me but to others. And you know what, because I want to be someone who can, I'll admit to the mistake and apologize: if I misunderstood your initial meaning and reacted in a way that upset you, I am sorry.

Right now, though, is not the initial problem anymore, so I digress.
sstimson wrote: one that for anyone could have answered for themselves as "no , but i decided to think this way."
This is another thing: if you had that answer in mind, why did you ask the question?
sstimson wrote: Please no offense was ever meant. Is there a better way to ask that question?
Alright, to the bold I'll apologize again: sorry I misinterpreted. But to add on, I'll answer your second question: no. "Does it really hurt that much to open your mind to other possibilities?" ...That is the equivalent, to my interpretation (which again, could be wrong), to something like "Why doesn't anyone else think this way?" To which the answer is simple: no one is you. No one thinks like you just like no on thinks like me. No one thinks like Jd-, no one thinks like Commi. No one thinks like anyone else and the problem here is that it seems you want others to think like you.

We can't. We can listen, we can agree, we can have fun, but we just can't immediately come to the same conclusions. It just doesn't work like that.

What I just said explains the below as well
sstimson wrote: please explain how a question I asked got you thinking that way:
If you don't think like this, you're close-minded (what, this is telling me what I am, how does a personal insult fit with a theory?)
sstimson wrote:Am I a whipping boy to always be thought of as bad and too crazy so I need to be attacked like that?
No, no one is a whipping boy. And seriously, there have been times where some things you have said could've held merit but the way in which it was said made agreeing far less appealing.

You don't deserve to be attacked, I don't, no one does, and if you viewed my comment as an attack, I truly am sorry. I do not mean ill will to the point of making someone feel attacked, but I do feel a need to point out when something can be seen as insulting. I misinterpreted you, and I have apologized, and now you have misinterpreted me.
sstimson wrote: That everyone have a right to attack me when I try ever much to avoid attacking or saying you must think this way.
If you feel that everyone is attacking you, then really: I'm sorry. I really am. I wouldn't want anyone to feel that way. However, there is something here that needs to be said: it is true that you (from my experience) don't outright attack people, to a point I'd even stand by. On a different end, though, there have been times where the manner in which your posts have been written can be taken very easily in the wrong way and be made to seem insulting and condescending.
sstimson wrote: Where in the past, have I ever said something like you think this way or your a fool?
The fact that my previous post never said anything about being a fool, that right there could be taken as a subtle way of calling me one now.

But I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you didn't mean it that way.
sstimson wrote: Others however seem to enjoy crushing me and in between the line are tell me" since you think the way you do, you are a fool and are to be treated as such?
And who are these others? Is it me? Or is it not? I am not going to go by my first impression, for your sake, but instead I'll put it here for you to reflect on:

First impression of this statement: "You (sonoci) seem to enjoy crushing me and in between the lines you (sonoci) are telling me "since you think the way you do, you are a fool and are to be treated as such"

My First response: You are not me. You do not say what I enjoy, much less when it is hypocritically demonizing me.

Current impression: "I am feeling ganged up on, please stop"

And my current, revised response: After this post, I will abide. No matter what is said, I'm not going to fill up this thread anymore. I don't want to be taken as some whipper as much as you don't want to be taken as someone who is "demonized"
sstimson wrote: Is it right for others to demonize me like that, when to the best of my remembering, I never done that?
It certainly isn't right to demonize anyone, but there is something to be said about the human memory. Even if you have photographic memory, no one can know every reaction that anyone they've encountered has had to something they've said. That would require ESP or something. We've all hurt others at times when we meant nothing like it.

Example: Your first question and my first response. According to the only ones who know, us, we were both misinterpreted and we both didn't mean anything by it.
sstimson wrote: And I am taking a wait and see approach. I do not plan on jumping over the possible cliff just yet.
And that's perfectly fine. My choice was to jump of the cliff. Others have too. Others are up there waiting with you. But no matter where anyone is, it was their choice to be there, no one else's. Some may have been persuaded some may have changed their minds.


@anyone who reaches this point: I apologize to you for wasting space and your time. I will stop right here to avoid anymore space being taken up.  :-[
Image
User avatar
leokiko

Posts:
1039

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by leokiko »

You guys do know that there's easily an 90%+ chance that next chapter will be just the ''investigation'' part of this case...right? No Sera, no Okiya, no Amuro.

As much as it hurts saying that... our guesses are really close the mark these days. We predicted an DB case after 800 back then.
Last edited by leokiko on December 23rd, 2011, 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
sonoci
Everyone's Child

Posts:
1548

Re: Detective Conan Files 801-80X Discussion Thread

Post by sonoci »

leokiko wrote: You guys do know that there's easily an 90%+ chance that next chapter will be just the ''investigation'' part of this case...right? No Sera, no Okiya, no Amuro.

As much as it hurts saying that... our guesses are really close the mark these days. We predicted an DB case after 800 back then.
That's true

But along with hope, there's the fact that it would be kind of pointless to have Sera and Scar Akai appear only in the first file and not mentioned again in the case.

There already seems to be quite a bit of obvious evidence. The phone, only one culprit, the knife...actually, even if it was self-defense, the guy technically killed her so he's our man no doubt. ...Unless Gosho pulls a "There was a third person! Ha ha!" stunt on us.

...and then there'd be no Gosho  :|
Image
Post Reply