
Enjoy.
Just raed it very carefully, I’m sure you’ll notice.SkyVenger wrote: ...
Kindly explain to this noob 'ere![]()
Terry wrote:To discuss the implications of that post, and to consider the moral problems raised by the thought process involved, we have a duck, a cat and a lizard.
ACCESS DENIED wrote:Parkur trolls even in his sleep.
Me too, because words are understandable as long as the first letter and the last letter are as they should be. If it's in the middle, then the eye can skip it because just from seeing these letters, the eye can tell what the word is suppose to be and you don't notice the change because you could see what it was.Yardbird wrote: It took me a while to realize what was wrong![]()
Nope, you're just an idiot.Kor wrote:Me too, because words are understandable as long as the first letter and the last letter are as they should be. If it's in the middle, then the eye can skip it because just from seeing these letters, the eye can tell what the word is suppose to be and you don't notice the change because you could see what it was.Yardbird wrote: It took me a while to realize what was wrong![]()
Umandsf wrote:That proves it, then. Jing = God. [white]Not really.[/white]Jing wrote: I work in mysterious ways.
I'm SO sorry to disappont you but you are terribly wrong.Jing wrote:Nope, you're just an idiot.Kor wrote:Me too, because words are understandable as long as the first letter and the last letter are as they should be. If it's in the middle, then the eye can skip it because just from seeing these letters, the eye can tell what the word is suppose to be and you don't notice the change because you could see what it was.Yardbird wrote: It took me a while to realize what was wrong![]()
![]()
This was once sent to me by my english teacher, I can show the whole mail if you want. If you read "raed" as "read" and you don't notice the spelling mistake, then there is nothing wrong with your mind.More Brain Stuff . . From
Cambridge University .
Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on !!
IS THAT SO????Kor wrote:I'm SO sorry to disappont you but you are terribly wrong.Jing wrote:Nope, you're just an idiot. :-*Kor wrote:Me too, because words are understandable as long as the first letter and the last letter are as they should be. If it's in the middle, then the eye can skip it because just from seeing these letters, the eye can tell what the word is suppose to be and you don't notice the change because you could see what it was.Yardbird wrote: It took me a while to realize what was wrong ;D
This was once sent to me by my english teacher, I can show the whole mail if you want. If you read "raed" as "read" and you don't notice the spelling mistake, then there is nothing wrong with your mind.More Brain Stuff . . From
Cambridge University .
Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on !!
btw, according to the mail, I'm a smart person ;)
I suppose you're just not very observant, then.Kor wrote:This was once sent to me by my english teacher, I can show the whole mail if you want. If you read "raed" as "read" and you don't notice the spelling mistake, then there is nothing wrong with your mind.
btw, according to the mail, I'm a smart person![]()
Umandsf wrote:That proves it, then. Jing = God. [white]Not really.[/white]Jing wrote: I work in mysterious ways.
IS THAT SO????kyuuketsuki wrote:Kor wrote:I'm SO sorry to disappont you but you are terribly wrong.Jing wrote:Nope, you're just an idiot.Kor wrote:Me too, because words are understandable as long as the first letter and the last letter are as they should be. If it's in the middle, then the eye can skip it because just from seeing these letters, the eye can tell what the word is suppose to be and you don't notice the change because you could see what it was.Yardbird wrote: It took me a while to realize what was wrong![]()
![]()
This was once sent to me by my english teacher, I can show the whole mail if you want. If you read "raed" as "read" and you don't notice the spelling mistake, then there is nothing wrong with your mind.More Brain Stuff . . From
Cambridge University .
Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on !!
btw, according to the mail, I'm a smart person![]()