Let's get programmy!

[redangelran]

$25

[ranger]

THIS IS HILARIOUS

[Akonyl]

clearly that guy should just learn to stop using deprecated functions/headers, geez.

I do like the two guys high-fiving over the mushroom cloud though.

[Kirbypepe]

clearly that guy should just learn to stop using deprecated functions/headers, geez.

^ =P

And Yeah I liked the flubber thing though that was funny


oh and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-Cr0EWwaTk

[Akonyl]

lole

I'm suddenly reminded of all the stupid bugs I've had to fix, this one in particular from a guy I knew

Code: Select all

int main()
{
  //declarations
  int array[10];

  //initialization
  int i;
  for(i=0; i<=10; i++)
  {
    array[i]=0;
  }

  return 0;
}

infinite looped

best bug ever

[Callid]

I'm suddenly reminded of all the stupid bugs I've had to fix, this one in particular from a guy I knew

Code: Select all

int main()
{
  //declarations
  int array[10];

  //initialization
  int i;
  for(i=0; i<=10; i++)
  {
    array[i]=0;
  }

  return 0;
}

infinite looped

best bug ever

I had also called that to be faulty, but because of the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException it generates when i becomes 10...
Also, is this Java?

[Akonyl]

it's a C/C++ bug, Java won't do it because it won't let you index out of arrays.

if it was java, it'd be a public static int main() anyway

[Callid]

it's a C/C++ bug, Java won't do it because it won't let you index out of arrays.

if it was java, it'd be a public static int main() anyway

Ah, IC. Still, I don't quite get where the loop comes in -.-

Actually, it's perfectly possible to have a method called "int main()" in Java, if the method is simply a non-public and non-static one. Actually, the reason I figured it wasn't Java was because of the array declaration, which would have looked way different in Java
Also, considering that this method being an int is completely pointless (actually, isn't the method as well?), am I right to assume that C/C++ does not have voids?

[ranger]

wanna know an easy way to know it was C/C++ rather than java?

he/she didn't put "int i" in the for loop, C doesn't let you do that shit

[Kirbypepe]

No you can have voids

Code: Select all

void main()
{
//do stuff here

return;
}

is perfectly valid in c++. Although I know that a lot of people prefer it to be int main.

[Conia]

wanna know an easy way to know it was C/C++ rather than java?

he/she didn't put "int i" in the for loop, C doesn't let you do that shit

You mean like:

for (int i=0;i<=10;i++)
{
cout<<i;
}

?
Cause I do that all the time so it is possible

[ranger]

wanna know an easy way to know it was C/C++ rather than java?

he/she didn't put "int i" in the for loop, C doesn't let you do that shit

You mean like:

for (int i=0;i<=10;i++)
{
cout<<i;
}

?
Cause I do that all the time so it is possible

For most compilers before C99 you can't initialize the variable in your for loop for C, you can however in C++

edit: sorry, my wording was kinda confusing before, but basically its easy to identify C because by just looking at the for loop variable initialization.  and Yeah you can do it in C++, like in your example above

[Akonyl]

Ah, IC. Still, I don't quite get where the loop comes in -.-

because if you didn't have a loop, how would you have the program loop infinitely?

as for the purpose of the loop, of course it has no function in the example I used, but I was just putting in the part of the code necessary to replicate the bug (the part where he was initializing his array).

as for voids, while void functions are perfectly valid, void main() is different. Depending on the standard (C vs C++), void main() may or may not be allowed (specifically, you're allowed to do it in C but not C++ based on the ISO standard and g++ will yell at you if you attempt to compile a void main()), more on that hereif you actually care. It's there so that upon process completion the process can report its condition back to the calling script/whatever (Just like System.exit(int) in java), but I've never actually used it for that purpose, it's just habit now.

@ranger: Not sure if it's only some or all, but even in some C compilers (gcc) you can define your vars inside your loop anyway, I just chose not to.

[ranger]

gcc is after C99, so yeah you can have it in there

[Akonyl]

why's this topic on page 3 I mean geez guys :<

aside from page 3 topics, know what else makes me sad? When you write some code for later use, and when you get to the point where you can use it it turns out that it doesn't actually do what you need to so you need to hope you can overhaul it or have to rewrite it. D: