Goddammit. I was also looking forward to Jd-'s idea.
Spy you're EVILZ!!
dumytru wrote:For spies and informants from previous rounds, it's obvious... wait, it's not!
I think people who were spies and informants in previous rounds can be trusted a little more, up to a certain degree.
I just realised, but as a Spy I wanted to kill the Detective and avoid killing civilians. I was almost lynched because there weren't many civilians left in the game.
If I were a spy I would carefully chose my targets, and I would possibly choose not to kill.
I'd totally do that and then start theories about why the spy didn't killed, or if they found eachother's identity (I wouldn't kill D1 and D3, or something like that).
Anyway, it's pretty bad, for the spies, to have few civilians in game. If you could stop killing, that'd be great (no kidding, really)
The spy agreed with me \o/
It could be that one spy purposefuly didn't killed, both tried to kill Jd- (which totally means the spies
are noobies felt the danger), or one of the spies tried to kill another.
Question to the GM: in the later case, one spy will get his/her kill failed, but will the other one recieve a notice?
Whatever the case, I think
it's pointless to start theories about it [the non-kill]. It won't lead to anything but false theories (
I know since I did it the round I was spy).
SA wrote:1. One of the spy chose to not kill Day 3 OR wasn't able to send a kill. If the spy chose to not kill, then please I'd like to hear more thoughts from others regarding this. If the spy wasn't able to send a kill, this makes Jecka a lot more suspicious. Aside from Osaka Detective not sending in votes, she was the only one who did so. If one wasn't able to send votes, isn't it also possible that they weren't able to send their kill? Why would a spy choose to not kill hoping that someone was inactive when clearly, everyone was participating actively.
2. One of the spy tried to ensure Osaka Detective's death. Hoping he really was the detective, and also trying to hide the fact that they killed on Day 3 which means they were one of the people who were able to vote. Hence, in this case, not Jecka. Arrests takes place before kills. And with the uncertainty of who Stopwatch will vote, all the more reason to kill Osaka Detective just in case he survives. Or... simply really hoping he was going to be arrested and their kill will be hidden.
Certainly, Jecka missed the phase, but I don't think we should label her as Spy, just yet. That being said, it's definitely suspicious.
Here's an idea I thought just now
We have a BIG problem. We're not using our lists at all.
AT. ALL.
But how are we going to use it?
My idea goes like this: we decide on a suspect and then we look at our lists.
Those who don't have the suspect on the list should say so in the topic. At this point we should have a better idea of the suspect's role.
The only probem I see is in the case we choose the Detective as a suspect.
So let's do this instead:
let's choose 3 suspects (or more,
but three should be just fine).
Everybody will vote one/two of them to be lynched based on their lists.
Since it's pretty random, we shouldn't be giving too much info to the spies. We also should be careful about choosing the suspects.
TL;TR
1. We chose
three (or so) suspects to be lynched based on people we
[don't] trust (definitely not using our lists).
2. We decide on one of those three suspects and get him/her lynched. We may (or may not) use our lists at this step.
I want to brainstorm about this idea with you. I think we should use our lists to a bare minimum!
That being said, I'm going to say we should lynch
MDavid or
Jecka.
(note I only have 2 out of 3 suspects)
I think this way we'll get a little more control over the lynching.
So let's do that three-list suspects quicly and then decide on one of them to be lynched.
