Okay. I have roughly 30 minutes until I have to go to school, so I won't re-read this again.
I apologise for any kind of mistake it mai contain.
Togop wrote:
Dimytru's kinda acting more quiet than usual this game.
Anyway, no kill day 2? Since there was no lynch, it didn't simply coincide with the lynch. Since there was no self-vote, it wasn't due to inactivity. Instead, it was intentional no-kill. I would concieve it being due to unidentified informamt, but there was a kill yesterday!
Yup, that's not my name.
This Round is kinda quiet anyway.
No kill Day 2. SA & Togop pretty much summed it up.
This means the Informant must be one of the less inactive players
(or the Spy is really dumb).
But then, assuming the Spy sent identification orders: there are three orders.
What could've gone wrong? The Spy missed the ID, the ID was too ambiguous (though what kind of Spy would do that?) or the informant didn't do the order.
First two depend solely on the Spy, so there's not much to talk about.
The last is pretty much impossible. There's no way the Informant wouldn't do the order on purpuse, and nobody was inactive.
If the problem is not unidentification, then I don't see any reasons why the Spy wouldn't kill.
I don't see any advantages with that kind of strategy. I'll think about it and post if I get to any results.
This is a message to all the players:
We need to start discussing already!