Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

The place for discussing movies, music, books, video games, and everything in between.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kogorou
*drinking beer and playing guitar*

Posts:
1132
Contact:

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock?

Post by Kogorou »

*drops in*
Well I have my own theory.
I'll skip the part with the ball because that's one thing you all pointed out.
Spoiler:
Back in the days when I was reading the books by Sir A.C.D  I always wondered about one sentence.
Holmes to Watson "And I just send the final latter in this affair"
Later on Watson gets called back, while climbing the path towars the Platform of the Reichenbach Falls, by a young boy.
He was holding a telegraph for Dr. John H. Watson.

From that point on I was convinced that Holmes send that letter and that he was ALWAYS aware and had planned everything out.
He didn't want his friend to see him die.

Well the Sherlock Holmes in the current time and place WANTED exactly the opposite. He wanted Watson to wittness his death so that the last offical source could give the right statement.
Molly must have been included into Sherlocks plans and was instructed to call Watson away. So that Holmes can take proper arrangemwents while talking with Moriarty.
Telling Watson that everything that the paper stated was right, was part of the plan to make him confused, to get him into a certain state of mind that could be interpreted as confused. And seeing his friend jump while beeing confused leads to a bigger shock.
Sherlock knew that he can't fool a Watson, because this man is the best doctor in and around London. So he had to play this little trick to get him confused.

The location choosen, right atop a hospital, was part of the plan. Moriarty killed himself and Sherlock just had to follow his plan. Jump. With the right training and wait for it there will be some hidden technique from many years ago that allows someone to survive this.

BUT my favourite theory is:
He never actually jumped.
Yeah there was the ball okay. But it's way to obvious for Sherlock Holmes to use such a simple trick.
Well that would be the case if they haven't slacked off with the viewers beeing idiots and weren't able to follow the whole story.
I asked some people after watching the series and they all stated "Dude that's way to complicated"
Suggesting that the producer heard that thousand of times, and one time to much he finally made Sherlock into something that every child could follow.
If the rubber ball theory is true. I am really upset.

Oh yeah and on the other hand:
THIS SHERLOCK IS A NUTJOB!
The original Sherlock Holmes always used topnotch equippment. He stepped above the law to protect it. He always stepped in for the rightous. This one simply follows the law. Uses normal technology that everyone else has at hand.
I mean come on!

I like the show it's just that it totally feels wrong seeing it.
Comparing everything to the old cases makes me sad. It lost its charm.
It can't compete with the show with the brilliance and the fun that the original Sherlock Holmes showed every time.
It can't put that smile on my face that I had every time I nearly got it and was prooven wrong.
Just by a simple mistake.
This show grands mercy for mistakes... It's way to normal.

And come on a gay looking Moriarty? o.O
That man was as much a genius as Sherlock Holmes himself.
He was the Sherlock Holmes of crime but always beeing a gentleman like Holmes.
This one is a sorry excuse of an mastermind.
MaitreDétective

Posts:
691

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock?

Post by MaitreDétective »

I watched the whole series, it was awesome :D
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock?

Post by mangaluva »

I can't wait for the next series in 2013- it'll probably involve some badass faceoffs with Moran, since in the novels after Moriarty's death Holmes had to deal with Moran tracking him across Europe and shooting at him. It was the main reason he pretended to be dead for three whole years- so Watson wouldn't get shot at too.

On a vaguely related topic, because it has both Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch, in The Hobbit they're going to create Smaug using motion capture. Meaning that there are going to be behind-the-scenes videos of Benedict Cumberbatch in a skintight outfit, crawling around and pretending to be a dragon. *Not sure whether to laugh or nosebleed*
MaitreDétective

Posts:
691

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock?

Post by MaitreDétective »

Someone knows if it's being aired in Japan? I wonder if Gosho watches this :p
User avatar
Hime-Chan

Posts:
345

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Hime-Chan »

mangaluva wrote: On a vaguely related topic, because it has both Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch, in The Hobbit they're going to create Smaug using motion capture. Meaning that there are going to be behind-the-scenes videos of Benedict Cumberbatch in a skintight outfit, crawling around and pretending to be a dragon. *Not sure whether to laugh or nosebleed*
I thought that Benedict Cumberbatch being Smaug was a rumour! I'd love to the a behind the scene of Benedict being a dragon xD Why would he be in a skintight outfit though? I think the dragon will be added later because you know...a human body and a dragon's kinda not look the same
Image
Self-proclaimed Cat-chef and Catetician on DCTP family
User avatar
Stopwatch

Posts:
1360

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Stopwatch »

@Hime: They base how the dragon will move off his movements so he needs to wear a certain type of clothing, not sure how to explain it really

...also, you thought it was a rumour? (o_O). Well, at least now you know for sure, right? :)
Terry Pratchett wrote: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
bash7353 wrote:I kind of always assumed that Haneda's parents might've had names.
Spoiler: Box full of stuff
Write a Will
Image
Some year's SS by Abs. :D
Image
DCW SS from Anime Girl 4 Eva]
Image
Thanks, cinna ^^
Image[/spoiler]
User avatar
Hime-Chan

Posts:
345

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Hime-Chan »

He wasn't listed in IMDB last month when a friend told me about it, and she wasn't sure, and he is still not listed anywhere sooo you get why I was confused^^
I know the kind of stuff they wear, I saw behind the scenes for Gollum, it just seemed wierd for a dragon, that and the fact that I don't remember any actor "playing" Aslan in Narnia ^^
Image
Self-proclaimed Cat-chef and Catetician on DCTP family
User avatar
Stopwatch

Posts:
1360

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Stopwatch »

...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit ... film)#Cast

http://collider.com/benedict-cumberbatc ... ew/127609/
(Posted November 21st, 2011 btw)

It's been out there for a while, maybe you've just not been looking in the right places :).
Terry Pratchett wrote: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
bash7353 wrote:I kind of always assumed that Haneda's parents might've had names.
Spoiler: Box full of stuff
Write a Will
Image
Some year's SS by Abs. :D
Image
DCW SS from Anime Girl 4 Eva]
Image
Thanks, cinna ^^
Image[/spoiler]
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by mangaluva »

For motion capture, actors have to wear skintight clothing so that all body movement is captured. Then they can build the dragon off of the way he moves. So among other things, Smaug is gonna have Benedict Cumberbatch's face XD

Aslan wasn't created through motion capture- he was pure, 100% CGI. So naturally, he only had a voice actor.

Also, IMDB isn't always that accurate... Benedict Cumberbatch has been confirmed for ages XP
User avatar
Stopwatch

Posts:
1360

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Stopwatch »

I wonder if there'll be any puns about him being The Dragon or something else weird :x.

...I can't wait to see what gifs/captions/memes will come from it as I totally forgot about the face thing :x. Possibly some pocket!Watson stuff? XD *flees*
Terry Pratchett wrote: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
bash7353 wrote:I kind of always assumed that Haneda's parents might've had names.
Spoiler: Box full of stuff
Write a Will
Image
Some year's SS by Abs. :D
Image
DCW SS from Anime Girl 4 Eva]
Image
Thanks, cinna ^^
Image[/spoiler]
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by mangaluva »

Pocket!John is utterly adorable XD And with John being a Hobbit, well, he's getting pretty pocket-sized ANYWAY... :3
Akonyl
Community Hero

Posts:
4200

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Akonyl »

mangaluva wrote: So among other things, Smaug is gonna have Benedict Cumberbatch's face XD
hilarious as that would be, sorta doubt it :P

it will be interesting how well it turns out though, since dragons tend to have longer torsos vs their limbs than humans, so they might have to distort the output of the capture a bit.
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by mangaluva »

Early photo leaks suggest that Smaug is going to look something like this.
Spoiler:
Image
It's not the finished product, of course. There's still CGI work to be done.
Akonyl
Community Hero

Posts:
4200

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Akonyl »

interesting theory there manga, but I'm sorry to tell you, I can see the pixels.

you've been duped!
User avatar
Hime-Chan

Posts:
345

Re: Are you guys watching Sherlock? (BBC Series)

Post by Hime-Chan »

xD
thanks stopwatch!
I so want to hear Smaug speaking...Benedict's voice is eargasm material!
Image
Self-proclaimed Cat-chef and Catetician on DCTP family
Post Reply