Eve.xpon wrote: So who is more confusing?
Eve or xpon?
Congratulations, you've successfully confused me.Eve wrote: YAY! I've defeated the mighty PT! XD lol
However, doesn't mean I trust you.
Eve.xpon wrote: So who is more confusing?
Eve or xpon?
Congratulations, you've successfully confused me.Eve wrote: YAY! I've defeated the mighty PT! XD lol
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
PhoenixTears wrote: Congratulations, you've successfully confused me.
However, doesn't mean I trust you.![]()


Don't worry, you're probably right.Eve wrote:
Don't worry, I'm sure no matter what, you won't trust me![]()
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
Don't worry, I know I'm rightPhoenixTears wrote: Don't worry, you're probably right.![]()
![]()

No, I'm not purposely missing that :V I really missed it. I thought you were sure that you were sniped. Which would mean that it had to be a PM from the GM stating that. Which would mean that you got info about a sniper tho you shouldn't have :V But I was wrong here, sorry XD I blame the mulled wine :xEve wrote: 6 messages in my Gmail inboxLOL
@ Akonyl, dunno why, but I have taken a liking to thisLOL
Also, Akonyl, you've said the defense that" I'm acting different" is not very good, then the attack at me saying "you were BO in round 13" is apparently good in your eyes![]()
Attack at Akonyl - You're Always good when you're BO. How's that? good enough? LOL
@ Kleene, are you purposely missing the spoiler tag that said "my deduction"it explains why iI think I was snipe, not to mention, if it was a normal attack, why would DT takes the trouble to say I was "shot"
when he could have used a knife example ... but meh, whatever you say at this point.

:<Conia wrote: :ʌ

I know that it does, because I checked the rules, I was just asking when that was added in.Kleene Onigiri wrote: @akonyl:
SnipeThere :VSpoiler:
Personally, I don't like that ruleAkonyl wrote:I know that it does, because I checked the rules, I was just asking when that was added in.Kleene Onigiri wrote: @akonyl:
SnipeThere :VSpoiler:![]()

pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
he can cover pisco, and if calvados does the night killing, the target will be erased.Eve wrote: @ Akonyl, also, you should help explaining to me how Calvados can cover erase.... I don't get it![]()
I added that with the healing and protection.Eve wrote:Personally, I don't like that ruleAkonyl wrote:I know that it does, because I checked the rules, I was just asking when that was added in.Kleene Onigiri wrote: @akonyl:
SnipeThere :VSpoiler:![]()
, not only did BO get the Nothing-Can-Hinder-Kill-And-Erase, that can be somehow covered?, but they also get to kill when someone was protected
![]()
@ Akonyl, also, you should help explaining to me how Calvados can cover erase.... I don't get it

Hmmmm... so Calvados is like a stunt-double, I get it now XD, thxKleene Onigiri wrote: Covered erasing works like that:
You want calvados to do the next killing. So, if you let him cover Pisco before, calvados will be able to use erase with his own killing. But that just works when calvados is doing the killing and covered pisco before.
Same with sniping. If Calvados covered a sniper, the next kill will be with sniping attached to it.
