SAMT: Round 15 - Mafia Historical Statistics Table up until

[PT]

well, in a not-so-stealthy change of topic ( :V ), JR has 5 games, 1 as town and 4 wins, has he won every time he's BO?

Nope he won in 14 as town. He was Agasa/"Genta".

ohhhhh right

grumblemumbleround14

Hush you grumpy old man. =P

[Akonyl]

well, in a not-so-stealthy change of topic ( :V ), JR has 5 games, 1 as town and 4 wins, has he won every time he's BO?

Nope he won in 14 as town. He was Agasa/"Genta".

ohhhhh right

grumblemumbleround14

Hush you grumpy old man. =P

don't hush you, me.

[Abs.]

well, in a not-so-stealthy change of topic ( :V ), JR has 5 games, 1 as town and 4 wins, has he won every time he's BO?

Nope 

Also Kleene you're GMing next round. You can totally ban Beastly and Holmes from it if you wish. 

[Kleene Onigiri]

well, in a not-so-stealthy change of topic ( :V ), JR has 5 games, 1 as town and 4 wins, has he won every time he's BO?

Nope 

Also Kleene you're GMing next round. You can totally ban Beastly and Holmes from it if you wish. 

true
But I don't like banning, since they could actually really play :V

[Eve]

well, in a not-so-stealthy change of topic ( :V ), JR has 5 games, 1 as town and 4 wins, has he won every time he's BO?

Nope 

Also Kleene you're GMing next round. You can totally ban Beastly and Holmes from it if you wish. 

true
But I don't like banning, since they could actually really play :V

Well, then please make sure they'll play, like pm them when they sign up and ask if they would really play

[Abs.]

How about this: I won't sign up for next round, but if one of them signs up and goes inactive, I automatically take their place!

[PT]

How about this: I won't sign up for next round, but if one of them signs up and goes inactive, I automatically take their place!

But if they don't sign up or they're actually active who am I gonna kill is gonna be my paranoid ally?

@Ako-chan: I'll hush you if I want to, me.

[Kleene Onigiri]

How about this: I won't sign up for next round, but if one of them signs up and goes inactive, I automatically take their place!

rejected

[Yurikochan]

How about this: I won't sign up for next round, but if one of them signs up and goes inactive, I automatically take their place!

rejected

If they are BO then their allies should be able to control them. They can flee if they do anything else.

[Eve]

How about this: I won't sign up for next round, but if one of them signs up and goes inactive, I automatically take their place!

rejected

If they are BO then their allies should be able to control them. They can flee if they do anything else.

Meaning if there's an inactive player who didn't flee, s/he is most likely BO?
though, TBH, if they're not playing, they shouldn't be allowed to sign up, , even if that means BO have fewer people (that's a good thing BTW), or the game has fewer people. I mean let's face it, They know how to play, but signing up and not playing is not "knowing how to play" now, is it?

[PT]

Alright, so! Here's the plan! I get my role. Plus if they sign up and go inactive,  I get their roles too! So I can be three people at once! Good plan, right? Right?

...yeah, I don't think so either. (I have a hard enough time keeping up with my own role. Well. Except when I die on Night 1. Then it's pretty easy, and I just have to watch all the madness unfold.)

Well, then I guess Kleene gives them another chance? And then whoever GMs after her can make the call on banning them from their round or whatever.

[Kleene Onigiri]

Well, in case those 2 want to sign up, I'll ask them if they really have time and can :V

And in case someone get's inactive (since others could too because of getting busy suddenly), I thought about arresting them instead of making them flee.

For once, in case they pop up again, they could be freed by Eri. And if they got to know something, they can still share the info. And you wouldn't know if it was a BO or a town either.

[Eve]

Well, in case those 2 want to sign up, I'll ask them if they really have time and can :V

And in case someone get's inactive (since others could too because of getting busy suddenly), I thought about arresting them instead of making them flee.

For once, in case they pop up again, they could be freed by Eri. And if they got to know something, they can still share the info. And you wouldn't know if it was a BO or a town either.

"Arrest was made due to angering the GM? XD lol"
We need to think of a cool "charge" or "crime" for that arrest then

[Akonyl]

Meaning if there's an inactive player who didn't flee, s/he is most likely BO?
though, TBH, if they're not playing, they shouldn't be allowed to sign up, , even if that means BO have fewer people (that's a good thing BTW), or the game has fewer people. I mean let's face it, They know how to play, but signing up and not playing is not "knowing how to play" now, is it?

I still don't get what your rationale is in saying that fewer BO = better. An extra hand to lynch and one less person you don't need to kill is just advantageous, because it's not necessarily the case that one's death will cause the rest to die unless they get involved in each other's lies.

"Arrest was made due to angering the GM? XD lol"
We need to think of a cool "charge" or "crime" for that arrest then

"Beastly was arrested for invoking the anger of God!"

[PT]

Meaning if there's an inactive player who didn't flee, s/he is most likely BO?
though, TBH, if they're not playing, they shouldn't be allowed to sign up, , even if that means BO have fewer people (that's a good thing BTW), or the game has fewer people. I mean let's face it, They know how to play, but signing up and not playing is not "knowing how to play" now, is it?

I still don't get what your rationale is in saying that fewer BO = better. An extra hand to lynch and one less person you don't need to kill is just advantageous, because it's not necessarily the case that one's death will cause the rest to die unless they get involved in each other's lies.

Yeah, I don't really understand that logic either. I mean I think it would be fun to have a game where there are very few BO and a lot of townies, just to see what happens, but I don't see less BO as a good thing for BO. They're not all gonna die together, unless, like you said, they're all lying to the same people about the same things or whatever and they get found out, or unless by some weird string of bad luck they're all lovers with each other. The BO isn't typically gonna go around telling people "Yeah, I'm allies with this person and this person and this person and this person and we've all proven each other" cause that just looks really suspicious.