Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Town Wins)

The home to DCTP Forum Mafia as well as any other type of random forum game that you can conjure up.
Locked
User avatar
KainTheVampire
*the Devil disguised as a mad vampire* >:D

Posts:
1050
Contact:

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by KainTheVampire »

xpon wrote:
KainTheVampire wrote:
xpon wrote: nomemory is a female!!!!!!!!!!!!

she is my soon-to-Be-sister in law
she is! ;D
so you are going to marry me even though you have you're beloved Satou that's not even Satou in heaven?! >.<
i just stay here in hell so you can do whatever makes you happy D:
but but.... you dont belong to hell.. you are not Bo.. like i am not really townie...


and everyone here knows that Kleene is in love and already have babies with akonyl. (Kaito with mitsuhiko???? ha ha ha)
geez... alright alright! *go back to heaven* happy? D:

that's... disgusting o.O XD
Image
Conclusion: "This area is full of crap" and "It's a nasty place!"

Drawn by yours truly
Paix672

Posts:
251

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Paix672 »

Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote: LOL Psycho Edition! This round's pretty crazy. XD

Aside from nomemory and Laurell, I'm suspecting two other players. Basically, after I received the dream. I PM'd the people involved. And oddly enough, two people (Xcommando and Sebolains) said their role in the dream was true. I'm not gonna post what roles they had in the dream for obvious reasons. But, obviously one of them isn't telling the truth. It could also be that:
1. They're both BO and claimed the roles to cast off suspicion, but that's not a good idea IMO. Also, if that were the case I guess they'd inform each other that one of them was in the dream and therefore only one would claim a role.
2. They're both town and claimed the role for some reason. Again doesn't really make sense.

Sebolains: Confirmed that the role said in the dream was true. He didn't really say much other than that I should prove myself to him. I told him that I can't trust him because someone else also confirmed their role. Still waiting for response.

Xcommando: I PM'd him and he confirmed his role as well. He also said that quite a few people including Kleene and xpon knew about his role. I thought it was odd that he told a bunch of people about role right off the bat. But then he explained it and it seemed reasonable but I still don't think it was a good idea. (Can't post the reason because then it'd be a dead giveaway to his role if he isn't BO.) And it seems like others have proven his role, but I still dunno.

So yeah, I'm not trusting either of them atm. And while their roles could be proven by investigations, we wouldn't be sure because one could be Vermouth disguised as said role. The only way to prove it is to have Sherry follow one of them since neither roles are supposed to have a scent. But then I doubt she'd come out and share her results because then she'd be targeted.
nomemory suspicious? i guess not. i investigate him the previous night and i received  result that wud proove he a townie. i cnt tell yet since if i reveal my investigation he myt b aptxed. laurell is no doubt suspicious.

bout sebolains i also investigte him randomly aside from nomemory. cn u please pm me hu is the other one claiming role? ill trak him down

but xcommando???? a townie, im sure. though i dont know his specific role.
I'm suspecting Nomemory because of what Holmes said, I have no reason to trust Holmes but he seems pretty confident. I don't think a BO would come out and advocate to lynch a townie because that's pretty risky.
Also, both Xcommando and Sebolains claimed thier roles in the dream were true. Did you investigate Sebolains randomly without knowing his action/ability and got a true result?
wid d help of sum1 of curs
So you investigated both Sebolains and Xcommando with someone and got a true result on both investigations? I guess that could be true. But a dream only contains one true fact, so why is it that both of thier roles were true? Maybe Ctu messed up again? :P
Beastly
That was expected from my Silver Bullet

Posts:
422

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Beastly »

Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote: LOL Psycho Edition! This round's pretty crazy. XD

Aside from nomemory and Laurell, I'm suspecting two other players. Basically, after I received the dream. I PM'd the people involved. And oddly enough, two people (Xcommando and Sebolains) said their role in the dream was true. I'm not gonna post what roles they had in the dream for obvious reasons. But, obviously one of them isn't telling the truth. It could also be that:
1. They're both BO and claimed the roles to cast off suspicion, but that's not a good idea IMO. Also, if that were the case I guess they'd inform each other that one of them was in the dream and therefore only one would claim a role.
2. They're both town and claimed the role for some reason. Again doesn't really make sense.

Sebolains: Confirmed that the role said in the dream was true. He didn't really say much other than that I should prove myself to him. I told him that I can't trust him because someone else also confirmed their role. Still waiting for response.

Xcommando: I PM'd him and he confirmed his role as well. He also said that quite a few people including Kleene and xpon knew about his role. I thought it was odd that he told a bunch of people about role right off the bat. But then he explained it and it seemed reasonable but I still don't think it was a good idea. (Can't post the reason because then it'd be a dead giveaway to his role if he isn't BO.) And it seems like others have proven his role, but I still dunno.

So yeah, I'm not trusting either of them atm. And while their roles could be proven by investigations, we wouldn't be sure because one could be Vermouth disguised as said role. The only way to prove it is to have Sherry follow one of them since neither roles are supposed to have a scent. But then I doubt she'd come out and share her results because then she'd be targeted.
nomemory suspicious? i guess not. i investigate him the previous night and i received  result that wud proove he a townie. i cnt tell yet since if i reveal my investigation he myt b aptxed. laurell is no doubt suspicious.

bout sebolains i also investigte him randomly aside from nomemory. cn u please pm me hu is the other one claiming role? ill trak him down

but xcommando???? a townie, im sure. though i dont know his specific role.
I'm suspecting Nomemory because of what Holmes said, I have no reason to trust Holmes but he seems pretty confident. I don't think a BO would come out and advocate to lynch a townie because that's pretty risky.
Also, both Xcommando and Sebolains claimed thier roles in the dream were true. Did you investigate Sebolains randomly without knowing his action/ability and got a true result?
wid d help of sum1 of curs
So you investigated both Sebolains and Xcommando with someone and got a true result on both investigations? I guess that could be true. But a dream only contains one true fact, so why is it that both of thier roles were true? Maybe Ctu messed up again? :P
*Could be Vermouth*
Image
Rhenandriel

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Rhenandriel »

Beastly wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote: LOL Psycho Edition! This round's pretty crazy. XD

Aside from nomemory and Laurell, I'm suspecting two other players. Basically, after I received the dream. I PM'd the people involved. And oddly enough, two people (Xcommando and Sebolains) said their role in the dream was true. I'm not gonna post what roles they had in the dream for obvious reasons. But, obviously one of them isn't telling the truth. It could also be that:
1. They're both BO and claimed the roles to cast off suspicion, but that's not a good idea IMO. Also, if that were the case I guess they'd inform each other that one of them was in the dream and therefore only one would claim a role.
2. They're both town and claimed the role for some reason. Again doesn't really make sense.

Sebolains: Confirmed that the role said in the dream was true. He didn't really say much other than that I should prove myself to him. I told him that I can't trust him because someone else also confirmed their role. Still waiting for response.

Xcommando: I PM'd him and he confirmed his role as well. He also said that quite a few people including Kleene and xpon knew about his role. I thought it was odd that he told a bunch of people about role right off the bat. But then he explained it and it seemed reasonable but I still don't think it was a good idea. (Can't post the reason because then it'd be a dead giveaway to his role if he isn't BO.) And it seems like others have proven his role, but I still dunno.

So yeah, I'm not trusting either of them atm. And while their roles could be proven by investigations, we wouldn't be sure because one could be Vermouth disguised as said role. The only way to prove it is to have Sherry follow one of them since neither roles are supposed to have a scent. But then I doubt she'd come out and share her results because then she'd be targeted.
nomemory suspicious? i guess not. i investigate him the previous night and i received  result that wud proove he a townie. i cnt tell yet since if i reveal my investigation he myt b aptxed. laurell is no doubt suspicious.

bout sebolains i also investigte him randomly aside from nomemory. cn u please pm me hu is the other one claiming role? ill trak him down

but xcommando???? a townie, im sure. though i dont know his specific role.
I'm suspecting Nomemory because of what Holmes said, I have no reason to trust Holmes but he seems pretty confident. I don't think a BO would come out and advocate to lynch a townie because that's pretty risky.
Also, both Xcommando and Sebolains claimed thier roles in the dream were true. Did you investigate Sebolains randomly without knowing his action/ability and got a true result?
wid d help of sum1 of curs
So you investigated both Sebolains and Xcommando with someone and got a true result on both investigations? I guess that could be true. But a dream only contains one true fact, so why is it that both of thier roles were true? Maybe Ctu messed up again? :P
*Could be Vermouth*
not relying in drem but i use skil base on the opinions of oderz hu r indid towwnie lyk xpon.

@Beastly: hu vermoth?
Beastly
That was expected from my Silver Bullet

Posts:
422

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Beastly »

Rhenandriel wrote:
Beastly wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote: LOL Psycho Edition! This round's pretty crazy. XD

Aside from nomemory and Laurell, I'm suspecting two other players. Basically, after I received the dream. I PM'd the people involved. And oddly enough, two people (Xcommando and Sebolains) said their role in the dream was true. I'm not gonna post what roles they had in the dream for obvious reasons. But, obviously one of them isn't telling the truth. It could also be that:
1. They're both BO and claimed the roles to cast off suspicion, but that's not a good idea IMO. Also, if that were the case I guess they'd inform each other that one of them was in the dream and therefore only one would claim a role.
2. They're both town and claimed the role for some reason. Again doesn't really make sense.

Sebolains: Confirmed that the role said in the dream was true. He didn't really say much other than that I should prove myself to him. I told him that I can't trust him because someone else also confirmed their role. Still waiting for response.

Xcommando: I PM'd him and he confirmed his role as well. He also said that quite a few people including Kleene and xpon knew about his role. I thought it was odd that he told a bunch of people about role right off the bat. But then he explained it and it seemed reasonable but I still don't think it was a good idea. (Can't post the reason because then it'd be a dead giveaway to his role if he isn't BO.) And it seems like others have proven his role, but I still dunno.

So yeah, I'm not trusting either of them atm. And while their roles could be proven by investigations, we wouldn't be sure because one could be Vermouth disguised as said role. The only way to prove it is to have Sherry follow one of them since neither roles are supposed to have a scent. But then I doubt she'd come out and share her results because then she'd be targeted.
nomemory suspicious? i guess not. i investigate him the previous night and i received  result that wud proove he a townie. i cnt tell yet since if i reveal my investigation he myt b aptxed. laurell is no doubt suspicious.

bout sebolains i also investigte him randomly aside from nomemory. cn u please pm me hu is the other one claiming role? ill trak him down

but xcommando???? a townie, im sure. though i dont know his specific role.
I'm suspecting Nomemory because of what Holmes said, I have no reason to trust Holmes but he seems pretty confident. I don't think a BO would come out and advocate to lynch a townie because that's pretty risky.
Also, both Xcommando and Sebolains claimed thier roles in the dream were true. Did you investigate Sebolains randomly without knowing his action/ability and got a true result?
wid d help of sum1 of curs
So you investigated both Sebolains and Xcommando with someone and got a true result on both investigations? I guess that could be true. But a dream only contains one true fact, so why is it that both of thier roles were true? Maybe Ctu messed up again? :P
*Could be Vermouth*
not relying in drem but i use skil base on the opinions of oderz hu r indid towwnie lyk xpon.

@Beastly: hu vermoth?
Because Vermouth will have the ability of that player. So he can prove himself? Right?
Image
Paix672

Posts:
251

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Paix672 »

Beastly wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Beastly wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote:
Rhenandriel wrote:
Paix672 wrote: LOL Psycho Edition! This round's pretty crazy. XD

Aside from nomemory and Laurell, I'm suspecting two other players. Basically, after I received the dream. I PM'd the people involved. And oddly enough, two people (Xcommando and Sebolains) said their role in the dream was true. I'm not gonna post what roles they had in the dream for obvious reasons. But, obviously one of them isn't telling the truth. It could also be that:
1. They're both BO and claimed the roles to cast off suspicion, but that's not a good idea IMO. Also, if that were the case I guess they'd inform each other that one of them was in the dream and therefore only one would claim a role.
2. They're both town and claimed the role for some reason. Again doesn't really make sense.

Sebolains: Confirmed that the role said in the dream was true. He didn't really say much other than that I should prove myself to him. I told him that I can't trust him because someone else also confirmed their role. Still waiting for response.

Xcommando: I PM'd him and he confirmed his role as well. He also said that quite a few people including Kleene and xpon knew about his role. I thought it was odd that he told a bunch of people about role right off the bat. But then he explained it and it seemed reasonable but I still don't think it was a good idea. (Can't post the reason because then it'd be a dead giveaway to his role if he isn't BO.) And it seems like others have proven his role, but I still dunno.

So yeah, I'm not trusting either of them atm. And while their roles could be proven by investigations, we wouldn't be sure because one could be Vermouth disguised as said role. The only way to prove it is to have Sherry follow one of them since neither roles are supposed to have a scent. But then I doubt she'd come out and share her results because then she'd be targeted.
nomemory suspicious? i guess not. i investigate him the previous night and i received  result that wud proove he a townie. i cnt tell yet since if i reveal my investigation he myt b aptxed. laurell is no doubt suspicious.

bout sebolains i also investigte him randomly aside from nomemory. cn u please pm me hu is the other one claiming role? ill trak him down

but xcommando???? a townie, im sure. though i dont know his specific role.
I'm suspecting Nomemory because of what Holmes said, I have no reason to trust Holmes but he seems pretty confident. I don't think a BO would come out and advocate to lynch a townie because that's pretty risky.
Also, both Xcommando and Sebolains claimed thier roles in the dream were true. Did you investigate Sebolains randomly without knowing his action/ability and got a true result?
wid d help of sum1 of curs
So you investigated both Sebolains and Xcommando with someone and got a true result on both investigations? I guess that could be true. But a dream only contains one true fact, so why is it that both of thier roles were true? Maybe Ctu messed up again? :P
*Could be Vermouth*
not relying in drem but i use skil base on the opinions of oderz hu r indid towwnie lyk xpon.

@Beastly: hu vermoth?
Because Vermouth will have the ability of that player. So he can prove himself? Right?
That's basically what I said in the first post.  :P
Beastly
That was expected from my Silver Bullet

Posts:
422

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Beastly »

To a DB: Contact me? Please?

Besides:

Seboilans is Vermouth(would be ideal next day), If it's wrong then try Xcommando next day. And this could be the Black Suitcase, by the way.(The confirmed two). So it can still be a waste. But that's best to do.
Image
Akonyl
Community Hero

Posts:
4200

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Akonyl »

Rhenandriel wrote:
Laurell wrote: Darn! Kain is a BO after all? Tsk...

Anyway, I'm just wondering if people here still wanted me to prove my innocence and to defend myself against the accusations of the others. Don't want to defend but I still wanted to play longer. I'll just share some info if you want.
defend all u want but u cant deny u a bo. am i right korn?
he learns pretty quick, this one.
Abs. wrote: So I just want to randomly throw it out there that if anyone tries to play with a multi account (1 person, two usernames) next round and is found out, both accounts should be banned from all future Mafia games.
yeah, though in general does jd- approve multi-accounting on the forum anyway? And hopefully you're not insinuating someone's doing this right now. :P
xpon wrote: and everyone here knows that Kleene is in love and already have babies with akonyl. (Kaito with mitsuhiko???? ha ha ha)
the only babies involved in the situation are abs's illegitimate factory babies, unless there's something I need to know about. :V
Beastly
That was expected from my Silver Bullet

Posts:
422

Re: Mafia - Round 10 (Night 2)

Post by Beastly »

Holmes wrote:
Commi-Ninja wrote: It seems unlikely to me that Abs. is BO.  After all, both Kaitou KID and Akemi tried to steal from him.  Why would the Black Organization need to steal from their own member?  I suppose it's possible they wanted to do that in order to prove themselves to someone else, but that seems unlikely at this stage of the game.
This is something I proved interrogating: Abs is not BO. Anyone who wants to confirm my role, go ahead, just PM me.
I just read this. Let's all hope something.

BTW if nomemory is not a BO, there is a 80% chance of Holmes being B.O.
Image
User avatar
KainTheVampire
*the Devil disguised as a mad vampire* >:D

Posts:
1050
Contact:

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by KainTheVampire »

lalala i can't wait to see the results of the lynching ^__^

ah and i have one thing to say: GOOD LUCK ALL TOWNIES! don't be tricked by the BO! they betrayed me so it would only serve them right to lose ^__^
I really hope you get one of them on this day ;D
Image
Conclusion: "This area is full of crap" and "It's a nasty place!"

Drawn by yours truly
User avatar
Kleene Onigiri
Community Rice Warrior
*punches Akonyl*

Posts:
2479

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Kleene Onigiri »

Akonyl wrote:
pofa wrote:
Xcommando wrote: i would like people to know last night i was also tricked/slandered.
Tricked or slandered? If you were tricked/intimidated...that doesn't seem right, because I was tricked/intimidated, and if Abs. was arrested for tricking/intimidating, he shouldn't have been able to use that action last night.

So did Abs. not get arrested for tricking/intimidating?
As far as I know, though there was the stipulation that if you arrest the killer during the night that the murder wouldn't happen, I'm not sure if that applies to all actions. It could also be the case that Ctu messed up, being that he apparently gave 4 roles in the first dream rather than the usual 5. :P
Well, arrest>...> other actions.

So an arrest would hinder an ability. It also hinders a APTX (and that't he only thing that can hinder APTX)
xpon wrote:
PhoenixTears wrote: I checked with the rules but it's unclear: If, during a house search, it's discovered that a crime was committed, is that person whose house is being searched automatically arrested? Or does Megure (or another officer) have to arrest him/her during the next phase?
i contact with kleene.. and it does reaveal any thing and if the police want the megure can arrest imidiately!
I didn't say that O.o"

It's not stated in the rules if a arrest happens automatically after a house search. So it's up to the gm. But personally I prefer if auto-arrest is only done on KID. Because no one would like to arrest KID as a town-police. And KID is a wanted criminal and thus popular and known, not like the BO or Eisuke etc.

And almost all other crimes are done by bo. So the police should arrest him himself. I prefer it this way because it could be important for the voting/BO to win. It's a difference if a BO is arrested a phase earlier or not. But up to the current GM ;)


@dreams: Yeah, dreams were stated in the rules D: But that doesn't mean the GM can't change it XD
But it will confuse the people receiving the dream if something is different than before/in the rules. Dreams are something you need to deduct. So you need to know how many roles are true too.

Ctu, there is still just 1 true role in the dream, right? Even if it's just 4 roles overall. But it's important to know how many are false/true D:

Akonyl wrote:
xpon wrote: and everyone here knows that Kleene is in love and already have babies with akonyl. (Kaito with mitsuhiko???? ha ha ha)
the only babies involved in the situation are abs's illegitimate factory babies, unless there's something I need to know about. :V
D: Mini-Akonyls! Yay!
Image
Keyhole drawn by Yuri Iwamoto <3
Spoiler: Secret Santa gift from Commi-Ninja <3
A Black Organization Christmas Carol (need to fix the link)
3DS Friend Code: 4141 3202 3514

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Giff holidays
User avatar
pofa
Community Savior
Armchair sorcerey

Posts:
1183

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by pofa »

Beastly wrote:
Holmes wrote:
Commi-Ninja wrote: It seems unlikely to me that Abs. is BO.  After all, both Kaitou KID and Akemi tried to steal from him.  Why would the Black Organization need to steal from their own member?  I suppose it's possible they wanted to do that in order to prove themselves to someone else, but that seems unlikely at this stage of the game.
This is something I proved interrogating: Abs is not BO. Anyone who wants to confirm my role, go ahead, just PM me.
I just read this. Let's all hope something.

BTW if nomemory is not a BO, there is a 80% chance of Holmes being B.O.
I forgot about this. Hm...

And to the people who proved nomemory's ability by investigation--don't forget about the black suitcase. :P
ImageImageImage

Superman = Captain America > Aquaman = Hal Jordan > Wonder Woman > Barry Allen > Thor > Martian Manhunter > The Hulk > Wasp > Hawkeye > [power gap] > Iron Man = Batman > [power gap] > Hank Pym
User avatar
KainTheVampire
*the Devil disguised as a mad vampire* >:D

Posts:
1050
Contact:

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by KainTheVampire »

@xpon... now that i think about it.. maybe there's an Akai in this game and he get's killed by BO
then i can dump you for him since he after all is my ex-boyfriend ;D
that way you can be with your dear Satou all you want D:
Image
Conclusion: "This area is full of crap" and "It's a nasty place!"

Drawn by yours truly
User avatar
Schillok
GCA UAC U AUG AUA

Posts:
699

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by Schillok »

So... no new information?

Nomemory is still suspected of being BO and was noone defended her? And no reason to mistrust Homes in the result of the interrogation he reported?


If it remains that way lynching is much easier today...
Image
User avatar
PT
Community Mad Scientist
to cammel's bav we go!

Posts:
1800

Re: Mafia - Round 10 Psycho Edition (Day 2)

Post by PT »

Schillok wrote: So... no new information?

Nomemory is still suspected of being BO and was noone defended her? And no reason to mistrust Homes in the result of the interrogation he reported?


If it remains that way lynching is much easier today...
So far, from what I've seen, we have no reason not to lynch nomemory today and no reason not to trust Holmes.
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
Locked