pofa wrote:
I just checked my PMs, conia, and what you said last night (before Day 2) was that "James Rye is innocent and I proved myself to him (not by investigation)." I took that to mean that James Rye didn't trust you because of an investigation, but for some other reason (which matches what you told me later about what happened).
I did not realize that you meant you also had not investigated James in order to trust him. In fact, I asked you about that explicitly at the start of Day 2 after Tommy got his results back, and it wasn't until then that you told me "I didn't investigate James Rye the first night." Since you had said you would investigate me last night, and since you said you'd investigated JR on the thread, I figured that if you were town, that was your ability and that's how you proved his innocence.
I can't find any other places before Day 2 where you said you'd never investigated, otherwise I wouldn't have advised Tommy to investigate that.
My logic is pretty good, though.
And it makes sense.
He stopped replying after I told him I was investigating his night action also, just saying.
I knew that he didn't investigate James Rye. That helps with believing that I'm James Black.
Therefore James Rye is lying.
And I'm still going to vote for him...
Conia, it turns out you didn't tell Pofa that you didn't investigate James Rye till today.
And also, you said I didn't tell you my actions but I clearly did.
Also, My night1 action: Investigate Abs investigate Laurell (False)
I did this because he said he was going to.
Night2: Investigate Conia investigated James Rye Night 1 (False)
I did this to see if Conia is truthworthy..