Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Forum reserved for discussing specific points of the story—mostly from the manga. Be warned, these discussions will be current with the manga and will spoil many plot lines for anime-centric fans.
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by mangaluva »

Abs. wrote:
Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: The issue if whether a disguise on top of a disguise would disrupt the one underneath completely.
Please see Hattori Heiji, the Invisible Man/Kudou Shinichi.
I think Chekhov meant a mask on top of a mask; Heiji was just wearing bandages over a mask.
User avatar
kyuuketsuki
DCTP Staff Member
Community Forensic Scientist

Posts:
776

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by kyuuketsuki »

The two orgs in the same city....

OK, here are my thoughts...

1) Both of them are under the control of the Yakuza, and the Yakuza are forcing them to get along [unlikely]

2) B-org operates on a much larger scale and therefore does not see the other as a threat. It seems apparent that B-Org is bigger and more powerful and is even an international org.

3) MK Org is really the Yakuza and therefore controls Japan, where as B-Org is a different multinational org that is working on a different level than MK org

4) The B-Org doesn't care about the Pandora Jewel, and cares more about controlling everything from the shadows, killing and doing research, so the MK org who is obsessed with the pandora jewel never conflicts with the B-Org. The B-Org doesn't seem to care about stealing anything in the first place anyway.
Akonyl
Community Hero

Posts:
4200

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by Akonyl »

mangaluva wrote:
Abs. wrote:
Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: The issue if whether a disguise on top of a disguise would disrupt the one underneath completely.
Please see Hattori Heiji, the Invisible Man/Kudou Shinichi.
I think Chekhov meant a mask on top of a mask; Heiji was just wearing bandages over a mask.
considering how easy it is to disguise yourself in the DC universe (every criminal and their mother does it), I'd hope a "master of disguise" like vermy could pull off double-masking.
User avatar
shinichi1977

Posts:
68

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by shinichi1977 »

We are yet to see what happened decades ago, when the laboratory of the Miyano's burned down and Starling died. Yes, I do imply they happened around the same time. I'll be curious to find out if my hunch is right, and Pisco was Vermouth's mentor (and that later the particular photo of him shooting the chandelier was not by incident) and which happened earlier (by which I mean, the Miyanos tried to ensure the freedom of their children and working together with Starling, and the BO found out and either Starling died first and Vermouth was poisoned by the Miyanos out of desperation or they died first but still tried to poison her, she survived, stopped aging and killed Starling).

The how is more easily answered: apoptosis is a process which works in all of us, responsible for killing off aged cells and telomerase renews cells. If not for cancer cells, such a pill would be worth of billions. Even with science fiction it does not make anyone young as a child.

As for why it was "first" tested on Shinichi: Gin refers to the (to my knowledge) only returning criminal in DC, Numabuchi Kiichiro who was subjected to be tested on but escaped before he would have met Shiho, went crazy and killed 3 people.
Abs.
DCTP Staff Hero

Posts:
3270

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by Abs. »

mangaluva wrote:
Abs. wrote:
Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: The issue if whether a disguise on top of a disguise would disrupt the one underneath completely.
Please see Hattori Heiji, the Invisible Man/Kudou Shinichi.
I think Chekhov meant a mask on top of a mask; Heiji was just wearing bandages over a mask.
Alright.  Then consider how it was important for Akai to point out to Jodie that since Vermouth's face was actually bleeding and showing signs of injury, it was her real face.  The point of him saying that is to negate the possibility that she still had another mask on at the time.  That the possibility needs to be negated says something.
Your opinion is always requested in Abs.' Random Polls of Whenever
User avatar
mangaluva
Fangirl, Pokefreak, Grammar Roman, Movie Geek

Posts:
5246
Contact:

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by mangaluva »

Abs. wrote:
mangaluva wrote:
Abs. wrote:
Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: The issue if whether a disguise on top of a disguise would disrupt the one underneath completely.
Please see Hattori Heiji, the Invisible Man/Kudou Shinichi.
I think Chekhov meant a mask on top of a mask; Heiji was just wearing bandages over a mask.
Alright.  Then consider how it was important for Akai to point out to Jodie that since Vermouth's face was actually bleeding and showing signs of injury, it was her real face.  The point of him saying that is to negate the possibility that she still had another mask on at the time.  That the possibility needs to be negated says something.
Largely what I believe it's meant to prove is that her youth isn't a mask; her aging was. So yes, it is curious that she could wear that detective's disguise over her Sharon face, if it was a mask; but then, I don't believe she needed a full mask to age, just a little makeup. And of course, we all know how much huge glasses help a disguise XDXDXD
Redmage

Posts:
14

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by Redmage »

shinichi1977 wrote: As for why it was "first" tested on Shinichi: Gin refers to the (to my knowledge) only returning criminal in DC, Numabuchi Kiichiro who was subjected to be tested on but escaped before he would have met Shiho, went crazy and killed 3 people.
That's a good point. I had forgotten about that. Haibara does explain in chapter 360 that he was sent to be a test subject. It does seem a bit odd then that they'd give up on the idea of test subjects until they run across Shinichi. You'd think they'd want to be sure it would work, which would require testing on human subjects...
Image
ヘラヘラ...Insanity is contagious

Decided to try a dragon...click please? Image
mizumi

Posts:
37

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by mizumi »

i don't really think she ate APTX~ i think if she did then she probably turn younger or smaller like Conan or Haibara. i think Gin probably notice it if that is the case, and he would know, APTX doesn't work and she wouldn't have give the drug to Shinichi in first place.
User avatar
shinichi1977

Posts:
68

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by shinichi1977 »

Redmage wrote:
shinichi1977 wrote: As for why it was "first" tested on Shinichi: Gin refers to the (to my knowledge) only returning criminal in DC, Numabuchi Kiichiro who was subjected to be tested on but escaped before he would have met Shiho, went crazy and killed 3 people.
That's a good point. I had forgotten about that. Haibara does explain in chapter 360 that he was sent to be a test subject. It does seem a bit odd then that they'd give up on the idea of test subjects until they run across Shinichi. You'd think they'd want to be sure it would work, which would require testing on human subjects...
They would want to be sure though it was not as much important when Shiho refused to continue experimenting and Gin would have gunned him down instead though he was forced to use the poison since the police was still present after the beheading case
Redmage

Posts:
14

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by Redmage »

shinichi1977 wrote:
Redmage wrote:
shinichi1977 wrote: As for why it was "first" tested on Shinichi: Gin refers to the (to my knowledge) only returning criminal in DC, Numabuchi Kiichiro who was subjected to be tested on but escaped before he would have met Shiho, went crazy and killed 3 people.
That's a good point. I had forgotten about that. Haibara does explain in chapter 360 that he was sent to be a test subject. It does seem a bit odd then that they'd give up on the idea of test subjects until they run across Shinichi. You'd think they'd want to be sure it would work, which would require testing on human subjects...
They would want to be sure though it was not as much important when Shiho refused to continue experimenting and Gin would have gunned him down instead though he was forced to use the poison since the police was still present after the beheading case
True, but Shiho refused to continue experimenting *after* Gin made Shinichi take the poison. Perhaps Numabuchi had escaped right before the series started (I don't think we're ever told when he does, unless it's right before that case in Osaka), and the Org just said, "Screw it, we can test it on victims."
Image
ヘラヘラ...Insanity is contagious

Decided to try a dragon...click please? Image
User avatar
shinichi1977

Posts:
68

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by shinichi1977 »

They would want to be sure though it was not as much important when Shiho refused to continue experimenting and Gin would have gunned him down instead though he was forced to use the poison since the police was still present after the beheading case
[/quote]

True, but Shiho refused to continue experimenting *after* Gin made Shinichi take the poison. Perhaps Numabuchi had escaped right before the series started (I don't think we're ever told when he does, unless it's right before that case in Osaka), and the Org just said, "Screw it, we can test it on victims."
[/quote]

If I recall correctly Shiho refused to continue working after she could not see her still living sister and declared Shinichi dead after her second visit to his house. Numabuchi escaped before Akemi met Akai Shuichi. I think Gin had it by chance, and used it
scineram
Laissez faire, laissez passer.

Posts:
710

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by scineram »

No. She taught Akako BDSM in exchange for casting a deaging spell.
Image
Detective Prince

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by Detective Prince »

Lol you guys scared Magic away with all your disagreements with his statement.
ransackthenation

Posts:
6

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by ransackthenation »

From what I understand from the conversations, you're arguing if Vermouth took apotoxin or not right? IMO, She took apotoxin and became 10 years younger. :D
User avatar
bluekaitou1412
Community Phantom
Indie artist. Likes books and all things Haibara.

Posts:
5389

Re: Why did vermouth take the apotoxin?

Post by bluekaitou1412 »

scineram wrote: No. She taught Akako BDSM in exchange for casting a deaging spell.
Probably. Yes, it could be.
Post Reply