[/spoiler]
.
ranger wrote:The Mask wrote:kkslider5552000 wrote:The Mask wrote:Okay, now that's just wrong, creepy, and disgusting on so many levels.
I'm sorry, I can't read any of your posts without thinking it's gonna lead straight into a political ad.
Don't worry. I don't plan on doing so. Gotta say though that I'm shocked to see this reply since the General Discussion forum said that there weren't any new replies.
But going back, I still think the underwear is sickening. But that's just me.
So I see you're new to the internet

The Mask wrote:ranger wrote:The Mask wrote:kkslider5552000 wrote:The Mask wrote:Okay, now that's just wrong, creepy, and disgusting on so many levels.
I'm sorry, I can't read any of your posts without thinking it's gonna lead straight into a political ad.
Don't worry. I don't plan on doing so. Gotta say though that I'm shocked to see this reply since the General Discussion forum said that there weren't any new replies.
But going back, I still think the underwear is sickening. But that's just me.
So I see you're new to the internet
Eh? ???
Was that aimed at the fact that Mr. Slider's reply did not reflect in the General Discussion forum page several days after he had posted his reply (which may probably be a bug in the forum that I should have just ignored like it was no big deal) or is this aimed at my dislike for the underwear with a really large face of Conan (which would be odd to point out at me, singling me out from the other users who posted their dislike for it as well)?
Nevertheless, I apologize for any problems that my previous post had caused. The fact that a meme picture was posted that somehow "attacked" me, in a way, must mean that I irritated the hell out of you guys to cause the effort to post that meme picture. So for that, I apologize.
[/spoiler]Agreed XDDetective Gin wrote:I will not think of wearing one of those in a 1000 years.
mangaluva wrote:The Mask wrote:ranger wrote:The Mask wrote:kkslider5552000 wrote:The Mask wrote:Okay, now that's just wrong, creepy, and disgusting on so many levels.
I'm sorry, I can't read any of your posts without thinking it's gonna lead straight into a political ad.
Don't worry. I don't plan on doing so. Gotta say though that I'm shocked to see this reply since the General Discussion forum said that there weren't any new replies.
But going back, I still think the underwear is sickening. But that's just me.
So I see you're new to the internet
Eh?
Was that aimed at the fact that Mr. Slider's reply did not reflect in the General Discussion forum page several days after he had posted his reply (which may probably be a bug in the forum that I should have just ignored like it was no big deal) or is this aimed at my dislike for the underwear with a really large face of Conan (which would be odd to point out at me, singling me out from the other users who posted their dislike for it as well)?
Nevertheless, I apologize for any problems that my previous post had caused. The fact that a meme picture was posted that somehow "attacked" me, in a way, must mean that I irritated the hell out of you guys to cause the effort to post that meme picture. So for that, I apologize.
You didn't irritate us, we just found it mildly amusing that you stated that character-decorated underwear is "sickening" as if it's the most disgusting thing you've ever seen. Seriously, if you think it's awful, you have clearly not spent much time on the internet nor wandered through any of its darker recesses. Protip: if anyone ever tells you to check out 4chan, don't.


[/spoiler]Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests