
, about the animation... the scenery stuff was absolutely amazing, but I disliked (well, that's a bit strong a word, it's more... it didn't stand up to some of the previous animation the series has seen) the animation for the actual people, the outside of Haibara's eyes for example, were really... well, they were three straight lines at slightly different angles at the top, I didn't notice it so much at first, but once I'd seen the Aoyama scene it was really noticeable. I mean, if you look around the 300 to 400 mark and compare it to this there's a lot of difference, but... I guess it's a toss up between the scenery and the people and to not take advantage of that scenery would be just... yeah, and anyway, at least it didn't have the horrible animation of that flower clock AO (poor Takagi D:).
(still didn't change the cheesiness of the 'words are swords' scene though)Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
[/spoiler]
]
[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]rev58B wrote:in my opinion the movie wasn't that great it was good but it wasnt as good as other detective conan movies it had its parts but from the long waiting we had to do i expected more from the movie in total i give it a 3 1/2 out of .


Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
[/spoiler]
]
[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]
Katty008 wrote:Who's Inaba Hiroshi?

skyechan wrote:Speaking of which, how can we be sure this isn't something thrown in there by Jd-...? =w=
skyechan wrote:Speaking of which, how can we be sure this isn't something thrown in there by Jd-...? =w=


HADAA wrote:Congratulations to those on finding the Jd-hype easter egg
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests