Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Post any Detective Conan news, events, questions, and the like about the anime, manga, movies, or OVAs that don't belong elsewhere here.
Yukimi
User avatar

Didn't you ever want to do this to the evil shadow

Posts: 339

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Yukimi » July 10th, 2011, 3:48 pm

1Kaito wrote:lol what's a waifu?


A concept derived from visual novels (and light novels and anime)'s geeks. It's the "japanization" of wife (husbando will be the rarer version for female straight fans or gay men) and refers to the character you claim as your wife, the one you like (it can imply a great deal or atachement but in most cases is use casually). It's not a very niché concept anymore as it pretty much used in multiple contexts nowadays. In Jd-'s case I don't know if he was using it in an ironic sense.
Image
Be the Ultimate Ninja! Join Oshoku! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!
kkslider5552000
Community Villain
User avatar

Let's player, writer of things, will reference that dumb song you heard once 10+ years ago

Posts: 6956

Contact:

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby kkslider5552000 » July 10th, 2011, 4:20 pm

It's popular because it was in Azumanga Daioh IRRC.
Image

3DS friend code: 2878 - 9709 - 5054
Wii U ID: SliderGamer55

New Let's Play! MegaMan 64: viewtopic.php?f=10&p=854685#p854685
Yukimi
User avatar

Didn't you ever want to do this to the evil shadow

Posts: 339

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Yukimi » July 10th, 2011, 4:50 pm

If we go by that it probably grew popular by boards like 2chan, futaba and 4chan but I really don't know, just speculating.
Image
Be the Ultimate Ninja! Join Oshoku! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!
Nyarl

Lost Detective

Posts: 670

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Nyarl » July 11th, 2011, 12:36 pm

Jd- wrote:
Nyarl wrote:Right, Slider doesn't have a general and continuing tendency to engage opinion with insulting dismissals. It's just an insane grudge from years ago. Pointing out you're now a bunch of jaded anti-fans is something to generate harangues and censorship. amazing the clique!

I'll stop posting at an appropriate post count. (Can anyone guess what it will be? It'll be within 20 posts.) You're a lost cause. Have been since I was thinking of suggesting some character development episodes on IRC before you were even "DCTP", and realized I'd be burning bridges I didn't want to burn yet. Enjoy your frustration that this isn't the Black Org. show and the filler is written by a hack writer who'll constantly run afoul of your "objective" lit. crit. crap.


You were the one who said that Slider's insulting of your website still bothered you deeply. I again remind you it was three years ago--time to let it go. If it was just about Slider and his "insulting dismissals", why do you not ignore him? If he is truly the village idiot that you continually insinuate he is, what is the point in feeding his troll urges? If his aim really is to always insult and demean you in order to get your attention, he has you in the palm of his hand.


Why can't you just ignore me when my temper is short? Because I'm not one of the kewl kids and you are a hypocrite. Pulling arbitrary time limits for grudges is just more evidence of that. The only "logic" you know is appeal to spurious consensus mores.

Far more people tend to side with me than they do you.


"The clique agrees with me and not you!" Indeed.

Beyond that, I generally tend to accept the opinions of others as their take on the series because that's what we should do as fellow fans--I don't label them "anti-fans" just because they disagree with me or insult my waifu. That doesn't mean there's no room for debate; there's plenty. What it does mean, Nyarlkins, is that not everyone is out to hurt your little heart (or your waifu-chan) when they disagree with you.


When Ran shows repeatedly shows investigative skills beyond her father's and average idiots like Vodka, no, there is no room to argue that she's one of the dumber characters in the series. When this is pointed out, complete with citations of evidence and reasoned argument, and the counter "argument" is "no one cares Nyarl" or "or you're the one with the bias, Nyarl" or "I stopped reading here" or "Your Ran obsession is unhealthy", there is indeed plenty of room for me to be offended.

What an utterly bizarre philosophy you have when there's no room for aesthetics that allows for grudges to last perpetually, even when the grudge is constantly reinforced, but matters of evidence and logic have infinite room for interpretation and disagreement. Politics and consensus mean more to you than validity and truth. Why are you following a manga about deductive reasoning anyway, especially now that the writer has gotten so "bad"?
Last edited by Kor on July 11th, 2011, 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
é»’ã
hmpf
Posts: 17

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby hmpf » July 11th, 2011, 2:42 pm

I doubt a post disproving an evidently false statement with actual facts would be met with answers like the ones described above- unless the poster demonstrated a presumptuous or otherwise unpleasant attitude.
In this case I diagnose the problem being a heavy case of Why don't you like what I like??.
People suffering from this often fail to realize that one can't reason with the unreasonable, e.g. continue debating over something they're most likely emotionally invested in with someone who isn't able to deliver a decent argument in the first place, which ends up causing more frustration and anger than it's worth- and an unpleasant attitude, as mentioned.

So, I, being a mere newcomer and this not even being my business at all, can still figure out the reason that is causing the misplaced discussion going on in here. What does that tell you.
Last edited by hmpf on July 11th, 2011, 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jd-
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

Deportation applications available.

Posts: 6101

Contact:

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Jd- » July 11th, 2011, 2:44 pm

Wait, wait, wait. What happened to me being an anti-fan? Did you find that statement difficult to defend, or was it merely another example of your habit to pontificate without good reason?

C'mon, Nyarl, you completely skipped over all of it!

Jd- wrote:Hey now! Wait!

Did you really just call me an "anti-fan"? I'm just re-reading that now to ensure that was the implication.

Wow, it was. Can you really question my dedication in any sense? I must be one hell of an anti-fan is all I can say. I've subbed more than half of every Detective Conan episode available in English. More than half. Of 622 episodes. That's not even counting most of the movies and all of the OVAs. I have stuck with this series at its best and at its worst. We both know you're attributing an argument to me that is not my own by saying that I am "frustrated" in any form. If I were "frustrated" at the (lack of) story progress, I wouldn't have continued to ensure there would always be high quality releases of both the anime and the manga, every week, for all these years. And the movies. And the OVAs. If that's the resume of an "anti-fan" who also happens to be someone who doesn't attack others at every turn simply for having a different opinion than them, I'll gladly take up that flag. Considering, you know, the "true fans" like you have, by comparison, done... virtually nothing but attack others that have done no personal harm to you.


I'll issue you a public challenge this time around. You usually avoid acknowledging anything but a very small portion of my posts in your replies, but why is that? Why continue to pick out what you must feel you only have a shot at defending and rebutting? Are you willing to say the rest is valid? If they are really so easily countered (as you very often imply), the counterarguments will be incredibly simple for you. It isn't like your time is really that precious--you invest a considerable amount of time visiting this place that you loathe so much. By thoroughly dissecting all of my posts with your supposedly ironclad logic, you would be able to do me in time after time, right? You know, instead of replying with pre-conceived soundbites meant to bolster your argument in "response" to bite-sized pieces of another. The challenge is a simple one: Simply answer all of the points I am raising in this post. It's very possible that I am completely wrong on some, which would make it very easy for you to answer. I think it is quite a fair challenge, and since your time is apparently coming to an end soon, it'd be a shame for you to run away from such a challenge now.

As for the temper statement: I can't just ignore you just because of your short temper leading to any given post because, if I did that, I'd be ignoring all of your posts (I was raised to not be so rude; unlike you, it would seem). I mean, let's be honest--you only seem to operate in one of two modes ("angry at the world" and "on the verge of being angry with the world").

I notice you cherry picked one statement to reply to in regards to my taking you to task on how haphazardly you apply the "anti-fan" label. Why is that? Afraid you may have been wrong in applying it in the first place and thus unable to actually defend it with a full reply? In fact, your entire argument (detailed in the opening monologue to the "Nyarl vs. The World" manifesto) relies upon everyone else being "in the clique", but if you actually ever bothered to read any discussions here... you would notice that I tend to disagree with people all the time. I am, in fact, often in the minority, and I have no problem with that. Again, the difference is I don't condemn people solely out of having a differing opinion. Try it sometime. Your imaginary "super anti-fan clique" is just that--imaginary. There is no cohesive clique that's out to get you.

If you would ever stop and listen to someone else sometime, you would remember what I told you weeks ago: No matter whether what you're saying about some aspect of the series is true or not, you cannot rave like a lunatic if you want to be taken seriously. No one listens to the one that cannot present a clear, reasoned, and respectful argument. If all you will ever do is attack others, no one will ever care what you have to say. If you would apply those arguments to a calmer and less antagonistic approach, it would very likely cease having the complete opposite effect. Notice that I am not saying you are "wrong" about whatever arguments you're making about the "facts" of the series here. That's because that simply does not matter when your demeanor is as callous as yours, as I told you before. If you act like you are out of your mind, people are going to treat you as such.

Just a tip: "It's their fault" isn't a particularly good defense for operating with such a meretricious disregard for others.

There is room for perpetual grudges, absolutely. The problem is that they are reserved for those that have nothing better to do with their lives than let them be run by the ill will of others. Do you have any idea how many people have targeted me and DCTP over the years, and never let up in their pure hatred for us? (I promise you they number far greater than what you have described for your end) The key to coming out on top and standing for something is never letting them get to you. If you are doing things for the right reasons, no amount of animosity will be able to keep you down. But, if you become part of the hate machine (as you apparently so willingly have), you've already long lost.

Ever notice that I very rarely have anything to say when it comes to the couples in the series and all that which you so commonly obsess over? It's because I just so happen to know that the series is what it is. If Ran really is such a fine sleuth, she doesn't need Nyarl to attack others in her defense. If your argument is, as you so often claim, based on "fact" and "evidence", then they are their own defense. Unfortunately for you, you rarely (well, never) leave it at that. If you replied to others with fact-based arguments that were not born out of deep-seated animosity for those that disagree with you, your posts would mean something.

I hate to break it to you, but a great amount of what you continually claim against "the clique" simply isn't as fact-based as you are so keen to believe. Here, are you actually claiming that Ran is literally and undeniably a better detective than her father? Is that really a fact or is that something that is up for debate? Hint: It's the latter as of this writing. Whether you like to use that as leverage for stating she isn't one of the "dumber" characters is inconsequential because of the fact that someone saying she is "one of the dumber characters" doesn't mean anything without an actual list. That's just another reason that your arguments aren't what you want them to be--so much of it is simply subjective. For example: How many "smart" characters are there in the series on which you are making this argument? If you are actually attempting to make an argument that appeals solely to the facts, stop injecting so much bias into it. To prove them wrong with something even resembling "facts", make a list of every recurring character in the series with their entire intelligence-based accomplishments listed and provide that to anyone that "hates on" your waifu.

Politics, and especially consensus, mean absolutely nothing to me. Do you even read these forums, or do you just come here to vent? As was stated earlier in this post: I am virtually always in the minority. If I cared about the politics or the consensus, I would continually placate others just to get them on my side for the next argument. You're not going to see me doing that--I don't hold back my opinion on something just because it may prove the unpopular one (anyone that's ever spoken to me should know that by now).

Now, Nyarlkins, are you ready for me to blow the lid off your entire argument? If I lent any credence to the Conan community's consensus, Movie 14 would be among the best Conan movies ever made. Unfortunately for you, I--unlike "the consensus"--consider it one of the worst if not the worst.

Well, so much for that! Thanks for playing, see you next time.

Spoiler:
Image
Last edited by Jd- on July 11th, 2011, 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jd-
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

Deportation applications available.

Posts: 6101

Contact:

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Jd- » July 11th, 2011, 2:46 pm

hmpf wrote:I doubt a post disproving an evidently false statement with actual facts would be met with answers like the ones described above- unless the poster demonstrated a presumptuous or otherwise unpleasant attitude.
In this case I diagnose the problem being a heavy case of Why don't you like what I like??.
People suffering from this often fail to realize that one can't reason with the unreasonable e.g. continue debating over something they're most likely emotionally invested in with someone who isn't able to deliver decent statement in the first place, which ends up causing more frustration and anger than it's worth- and to a unpleasant attitude, as mentioned.

So, me being a mere newcomer and this not even being my business at all, can still figure out the reason that is causing the misplaced discussion going on in here. What does that tell you.


You've only been here a couple of months and are already leagues ahead of Nyarlkins. I may as well make your community title "The Doctor", because your diagnosis is... correct!
Ampersand

& rainy days ... "

Posts: 12

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Ampersand » July 11th, 2011, 3:38 pm

I love this.
Nyarl

Lost Detective

Posts: 670

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Nyarl » July 11th, 2011, 6:39 pm

hmpf wrote:I doubt a post disproving an evidently false statement with actual facts would be met with answers like the ones described above- unless the poster demonstrated a presumptuous or otherwise unpleasant attitude.
In this case I diagnose the problem being a heavy case of Why don't you like what I like??.
People suffering from this often fail to realize that one can't reason with the unreasonable e.g. continue debating over something they're most likely emotionally invested in with someone who isn't able to deliver decent statement in the first place, which ends up causing more frustration and anger than it's worth- and a unpleasant attitude, as mentioned.


So, arguing Ran is not being as dumb as Vodka is really me asking why people can't like my dear character? I've written over and over again they don't have to like the character. They just can't make up nonsense to justify their dislike. When they persist, I reserve the right to be as snide and sarcastic in my responses as any other poster, especially the one that can't be named by me now due to clique edict.

jd wrote:Ever notice that I very rarely have anything to say when it comes to the couples in the series and all that which you so commonly obsess over? It's because I just so happen to know that the series is what it is.


If you don't know the manga-ka has some conceit that's he's also a romance writer, you don't actually know as much as you claim you know. How would you classify Chotto-matte? "Science Fiction"? Aoyama won Shogakukan's "best newcomer" for it. When he says himself that with Conan he wanted to write a romantic comedy it means absolutely nothing? Aoyama's just trollin'? No it's obviously not a "romance" manga, but "romance" is right up there with "noir suspense" behind "solve it yourself mystery". This is a fact. You posturing about "taking things for what they are" is empty, reasonless posturing (so empty my attempt to address it might be a straw man, I can't tell). You can think the romance is terrible, of course, and I have no argument with you about that until you try to justify your aesthetics as anything more than aesthetics.

If you act like you are out of your mind, people are going to treat you as such.

"It's their fault" isn't a particularly good defense for operating with such a meretricious disregard for others.


Congratulations for being such a "proud and humble" politician.

How many "smart" characters are there in the series on which you are making this argument? If you are actually attempting to make an argument that appeals solely to the facts, stop injecting so much bias into it. To prove them wrong with something even resembling "facts", make a list of every recurring character in the series with their entire intelligence-based accomplishments listed and provide that to anyone that "hates on" your waifu.


That's an absurd request for such a large series. I'm pretty sure if I actually accomplished it you would only ridicule my obsession, anyway.

I actually did put in a list of recurring characters relative problem solving abilities, and gave some arguments as to why people were where they were on the list. Even allowed for imprecision/ambiguity (not enough, of course, can't really do error bars in typed text with a large set of characters). Even put Ran below everyone's favorite little wasted character and Gin, and got incredulity and bias accusations anyway. Ambiguity in placing her relative to a sober and caring Kogoro vs. typical Kogoro I can accept as arguable (though, even caring and sober Kogoro needs hints shouted), ambiguity between Ran and Vodka is just imagining Vodka does a lot of smart stuff off scene, or can't be "that stupid" because he is Org. Might as well say Genta is the smartest character, and there's no point in arguing bout it. Of course, that cuts both ways, right? Arguing that Ran isn't among the bottom tier of problem solvers shouldn't have been met with incredulity, but respect, right? Why, Ran might be smarter than Gin, too, in the solipsist world of agreeing to disagree. But that's not how the thread went, and I was plenty matter of fact/respectful in my first few posts.

If your argument is, as you so often claim, based on "fact" and "evidence", then they are their own defense.


I don't see why people besides myself can't be called on their stubbornness and bias, especially given the example set by that which cannot be named by me due to your edict. Unless you actually mean defending Ran by citing evidence is pointless since fans are omniscient and already know all the relevant facts, which is too absurd to even brook as your possible meaning. Note I used to try to go into discussions with the attitude that this is a long series and people are going to focus on that which interests them the most as a perfectly legitimate reason for some particularly absurd assertions. "Ran isn't an interesting character, therefore I don't care what she did in chapter whatever, maybe she's not as dumb/cowardly as I just claimed, but I don't really care," would be a perfectly valid way to end discussions, provided it's earnest and not just an excuse to silence correction (ie, the debunked claim is repeated later, then the repeated rebuttal dismissed  as "obsessively not letting it go after agreeing to disagree", or some such).
é»’ã
ddrober2003
User avatar
Posts: 96

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby ddrober2003 » July 11th, 2011, 6:55 pm

Another scene, from two different episodes(AO I think) was with the traveling acting troupe.  One because of the leaders sister and Ayumi giving each other glares over Conan I found rather funny.  I also liked another episode with the same acting troupe where the leader basically looked like Kenshin with a mask, not sure why aside that I think Kenshin is awsome.

A scene I didn't like was when Jodie wigged out on Camel when he mentioned an Alcohol that Akai prefered and she blew up on him.  I can understand being upset, it just felt overboard to me.
Nyarl

Lost Detective

Posts: 670

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Nyarl » July 11th, 2011, 7:15 pm

BTW,

I can't just ignore you just because of your short temper leading to any given post because, if I did that, I'd be ignoring all of your posts (I was raised to not be so rude; unlike you, it would seem). I mean, let's be honest--you only seem to operate in one of two modes ("angry at the world" and "on the verge of being angry with the world").


Do you seriously want me to address every single point of empty posturing like this in all your posts? "Ignore trolls, but troll the angry man," might be a popular internet meme, but what else is there to say about it except that it leads to insular cliques who hypocritically blame the people offended by their kewl kids on their thin skin but harangue the angry man who throws back insults at them. Wait, I've addressed that already. Do you want me to point out the posts I've made that have not one whit of invective in them so you can dismiss them as the exception to the rule? Apart from addressing the pointlessness of addressing such points, I don't see the point.
é»’ã
Jd-
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

Deportation applications available.

Posts: 6101

Contact:

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Jd- » July 11th, 2011, 7:30 pm

You do realize that you completely misinterpreted that line, right? Me knowing that "the series is what it is" is referring to false couples and the related couple wars, as I have stated in public any number of times--not that the couples and their relationships do not matter. It has nothing to do with whether there is or isn't meaningful romance plots in the series, but nice try (and nice fail). Next time, be certain of what you're replying to before you post--it makes you look a lot less impulsive. Then again, if you would avoid cherry picking what you wish to reply to, you would likely not find yourself in this situation so often. Better luck next time, I guess? (For the record: I happen to enjoy the romance plots, even more than the mysteries on occasion; you'd know as much if you bothered to read around instead of assigning me stances that are clearly not my own. Well, I shouldn't be surprised at you imagining things again.)

Is it really that unreasonable of a request? Why does that matter if you are dealing purely in facts? If you can't be thorough in your fact-telling, your arguments are not solely based on facts (as you so often imply). Because, to be frank, until you've done all your research, you don't know what is a fact and what isn't. When you stop insisting that all of what you do is based on fact and has nothing to do with opinion (what you continually attack others over), I will let you off the hook.

You likely should have taken a week or two before replying again, as this has been one mess of a reply on your part. The point of them being their own defense was that they will speak for themselves--your own personal spin if it is indeed based on fact and evidence as you, yourself, continue to claim is completely unnecessary. Now, if you plan to introduce your own opinions to posts, that's fine, but at that point, you are in the realm of opinion (which you pretend to rarely find yourself, as, apparently, all of your opinions are actually just Nyarl Factsâ„¢ in disguise).

Do you really not "see why" others aren't in the same boat as you when it comes to being called on their "stubbornness and bias"? Foremost: No, it isn't because of the imaginary clique that you so fancy as your greatest foe. It is because they do not tend to unleash vicious, often unprovoked personal attacks on others. You have openly admitted that you are acting out, so posing a question such as this really serves no purpose--you know the reason that you are treated differently: It's because you treat others the way you do.

Nyarl wrote:Note I used to try to go into discussions with the attitude that this is a long series and people are going to focus on that which interests them the most as a perfectly legitimate reason for some particularly absurd assertions.


So, you are saying that you "used to" be cordial with others and respect their opinions, and now do not. Agreed on the latter at least. Furthermore, in essence, you are openly admitting that bias plays a large part in your interactions of late and that you do not approach any such discussions with fellow fans with an open mind any longer, right? It's things like this that demonstrate to others to never take anything you say seriously. I accused you a number of times of blatantly disregarding the takes of others on the series--I'm just glad you're finally ready to admit it.




On point: You completely avoided my challenge, as expected. What are you afraid of? Are you not willing to stand by what you said before? Am I really an anti-fan?

From here on, I'll keep a log of every word you do not reply to so that we may have a record of all the discussions you are avoiding (whatever the reason may be). Since you always do direct replies on a line-by-line basis in multi-quotes, this will not be difficult to keep track of, right?

Jd- wrote:Wait, wait, wait. What happened to me being an anti-fan? Did you find that statement difficult to defend, or was it merely another example of your habit to pontificate without good reason?

C'mon, Nyarl, you completely skipped over all of it!

Jd- wrote:Hey now! Wait!

Did you really just call me an "anti-fan"? I'm just re-reading that now to ensure that was the implication.

Wow, it was. Can you really question my dedication in any sense? I must be one hell of an anti-fan is all I can say. I've subbed more than half of every Detective Conan episode available in English. More than half. Of 622 episodes. That's not even counting most of the movies and all of the OVAs. I have stuck with this series at its best and at its worst. We both know you're attributing an argument to me that is not my own by saying that I am "frustrated" in any form. If I were "frustrated" at the (lack of) story progress, I wouldn't have continued to ensure there would always be high quality releases of both the anime and the manga, every week, for all these years. And the movies. And the OVAs. If that's the resume of an "anti-fan" who also happens to be someone who doesn't attack others at every turn simply for having a different opinion than them, I'll gladly take up that flag. Considering, you know, the "true fans" like you have, by comparison, done... virtually nothing but attack others that have done no personal harm to you.


I'll issue you a public challenge this time around. You usually avoid acknowledging anything but a very small portion of my posts in your replies, but why is that? Why continue to pick out what you must feel you only have a shot at defending and rebutting? Are you willing to say the rest is valid? If they are really so easily countered (as you very often imply), the counterarguments will be incredibly simple for you. It isn't like your time is really that precious--you invest a considerable amount of time visiting this place that you loathe so much. By thoroughly dissecting all of my posts with your supposedly ironclad logic, you would be able to do me in time after time, right? You know, instead of replying with pre-conceived soundbites meant to bolster your argument in "response" to bite-sized pieces of another. The challenge is a simple one: Simply answer all of the points I am raising in this post. It's very possible that I am completely wrong on some, which would make it very easy for you to answer. I think it is quite a fair challenge, and since your time is apparently coming to an end soon, it'd be a shame for you to run away from such a challenge now.

I notice you cherry picked one statement to reply to in regards to my taking you to task on how haphazardly you apply the "anti-fan" label. Why is that? Afraid you may have been wrong in applying it in the first place and thus unable to actually defend it with a full reply? In fact, your entire argument (detailed in the opening monologue to the "Nyarl vs. The World" manifesto) relies upon everyone else being "in the clique", but if you actually ever bothered to read any discussions here... you would notice that I tend to disagree with people all the time. I am, in fact, often in the minority, and I have no problem with that. Again, the difference is I don't condemn people solely out of having a differing opinion. Try it sometime. Your imaginary "super anti-fan clique" is just that--imaginary. There is no cohesive clique that's out to get you.

If you would ever stop and listen to someone else sometime, you would remember what I told you weeks ago: No matter whether what you're saying about some aspect of the series is true or not, you cannot rave like a lunatic if you want to be taken seriously. No one listens to the one that cannot present a clear, reasoned, and respectful argument. If all you will ever do is attack others, no one will ever care what you have to say. If you would apply those arguments to a calmer and less antagonistic approach, it would very likely cease having the complete opposite effect. Notice that I am not saying you are "wrong" about whatever arguments you're making about the "facts" of the series here. That's because that simply does not matter when your demeanor is as callous as yours, as I told you before.

There is room for perpetual grudges, absolutely. The problem is that they are reserved for those that have nothing better to do with their lives than let them be run by the ill will of others. Do you have any idea how many people have targeted me and DCTP over the years, and never let up in their pure hatred for us? (I promise you they number far greater than what you have described for your end) The key to coming out on top and standing for something is never letting them get to you. If you are doing things for the right reasons, no amount of animosity will be able to keep you down. But, if you become part of the hate machine (as you apparently so willingly have), you've already long lost.

If Ran really is such a fine sleuth, she doesn't need Nyarl to attack others in her defense. Unfortunately for you, you rarely (well, never) leave it at that. If you replied to others with fact-based arguments that were not born out of deep-seated animosity for those that disagree with you, your posts would mean something.

I hate to break it to you, but a great amount of what you continually claim against "the clique" simply isn't as fact-based as you are so keen to believe. Here, are you actually claiming that Ran is literally and undeniably a better detective than her father? Is that really a fact or is that something that is up for debate? Hint: It's the latter as of this writing. Whether you like to use that as leverage for stating she isn't one of the "dumber" characters is inconsequential because of the fact that someone saying she is "one of the dumber characters" doesn't mean anything without an actual list. That's just another reason that your arguments aren't what you want them to be--so much of it is simply subjective.

Politics, and especially consensus, mean absolutely nothing to me. Do you even read these forums, or do you just come here to vent? As was stated earlier in this post: I am virtually always in the minority. If I cared about the politics or the consensus, I would continually placate others just to get them on my side for the next argument. You're not going to see me doing that--I don't hold back my opinion on something just because it may prove the unpopular one (anyone that's ever spoken to me should know that by now).

Now, Nyarlkins, are you ready for me to blow the lid off your entire argument? If I lent any credence to the Conan community's consensus, Movie 14 would be among the best Conan movies ever made. Unfortunately for you, I--unlike "the consensus"--consider it one of the worst if not the worst.

Well, so much for that! Thanks for playing, see you next time.


I noticed that you strategically avoided all of the instances of me categorically proving you to be absolutely in the wrong on many of your assumptions. Surely it's just a coincidence and Nyarl would never do such a thing . . . !?!?

From the last post, you replied to approximately 241 words--of 1,073. That was 78% of the post ignored. Are we to believe that you only had a defense for 22% of that post and that I completely pwnz0red you over the remaining 78%?

The challenge still stands, by the way, but--unfortunately for you--it began in the last post. You have some catching up to do.

Nyarl wrote:Do you seriously want me to address every single point of empty posturing like this in all your posts? "Ignore trolls, but troll the angry man," might be a popular internet meme, but what else is there to say about it except that it leads to insular cliques who hypocritically blame the people offended by their kewl kids on their thin skin but harangue the angry man who throws back insults at them. Wait, I've addressed that already. Do you want me to point out the posts I've made that have not one whit of invective in them so you can dismiss them as the exception to the rule? Apart from addressing the pointlessness of addressing such points, I don't see the point.


I gladly address the many apocryphal pretenses inherent throughout all of your posts, so why not? But, no, you do not have to address "every single point" (though that was a decent attempt at a diversion again, when all you have really done is dodge much of the argument entirely)--you just have to reply to the many questions you have ignored instead of intentionally avoiding being taken to task for what you have said.

Being a gentleman, I will gladly reply to any post you have made on this subject to which you seek a reply. Point me to them if you feel I have not done an adequate job (either now or in the past) of showcasing my viewpoint in directly reply to yours and I will more than make up for it.

If you would like, I will gladly review our past exchanges and update the log to reflect the many, many points you so willingly avoided answering.

Spoiler:
Image
Last edited by Jd- on July 11th, 2011, 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dilbertschalter
User avatar
Posts: 1062

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby dilbertschalter » July 11th, 2011, 9:39 pm

Ampersand wrote:I love this.


i don't, this whole exchange is dumb and adds nothing to the discussion.
Detective Movies Contest 2013: Information Thread  Current Faceoff

"The energies of our system will decay; the glory of the sun will be dimmed, and the earth, tideless and inert, will no longer tolerate the race which has for a moment disturbed its solitude. Man will go down into the pit, and all his thoughts will perish. The uneasy consciousness, which in this obscure corner has for a brief space broken the contented silence of the universe, will be at rest. Matter will know itself no longer. 'Imperishable monuments' and 'immortal deeds,' death itself, and love stronger than death, will be as though they had never been."
Jd-
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

Deportation applications available.

Posts: 6101

Contact:

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Jd- » July 11th, 2011, 9:46 pm

dilbertschalter wrote:i don't, this whole exchange is dumb and adds nothing to the discussion.


Actually, you're right. Nyarl and I are more or less speaking exclusively to each other, so we may as well take it to PM.

Nyarl: PM me any further correspondence (including, but not limited to, a reply to the last post). Further posts straying from the topic (here or elsewhere) will be removed.
Nyarl

Lost Detective

Posts: 670

Re: Most favorite and least favorite scene in the series

Postby Nyarl » July 11th, 2011, 10:02 pm

(For the record: I happen to enjoy the romance plots, even more than the mysteries on occasion; you'd know as much if you bothered to read around instead of assigning me stances that are clearly not my own. Well, I shouldn't be surprised at you imagining things again.)


That's not the impression you give when you abstract "met once in childhood" to the equivalence of "childhood friends" so you can claim Aoyama is overusing the same tired story premise. Hey, did you admit you blundered with by tossing Matsumoto's serial killer story into the same "not so special" pot when his actual story itself had nothing at all to do with romance, childhood friend or otherwise, and I just missed the mea culpa? All I remember is a thread lock (which is amusing given you current harangues egging me on).

I guess if you don't really think that Aoyama is tediously drawing out the series with uninspired writing I can't call you an anti-fan. But, I will call the people who do complain that it's not the "Org. Show" such. Their whining is just tiresome at this point. If they didn't know what to expect from the first drawn out overarching plot, they only have themselves (or whoever pushed the Org. plot as *the* reason to follow the manga onto the poor folks) to blame. Folks who don't want Ran/the romance forced into the plot are likewise missing some big hints they'll be weeping tears of blood, "detective manga" or not. Folk who are whining about their favorite wasted character however are merely where I was a few years ago, and will certainly see their character become prominent whenever certain loose ends are tied up. Might take a few years, but Aoyama hasn't "forgotten" that stuff. (Which is more respect than that which cannot be named showed me when I was whining.)

You have openly admitted that you are acting out, so posing a question such as this really serves no purpose--you know the reason that you are treated differently: It's because you treat others the way you do.


While that which cannot be named's version of respectful discourse can not even be named because it only shows my insanity, or some such blather. No, an "amaze you" is a perfectly valid response to that very cliquish double standard.
é»’ã

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests