dilbertschalter wrote:Though I'm not going to change anyone's mind on this (I think I've made the argument before to no avail), I don't see why non-canon material can't be used for discussion of character traits. When it comes to the BO, using 13 as support for an argument should be shied away from because, even though it was made as to not contradict canon (iirc at least) and, similarly, the many ShinRan scenes in the movies don't mean much of anything as far as the romance plot of the manga is concerned. But when it comes to how well someone can sing or use a gun I just don't see much of a downside to using the movies as evidence.
Dus wrote:sstimson wrote:Well there is a picture of Him playing a recorder in Episode 18, So the part of him playing a musical instrument is canon, but it is not a Violin. But I believe that was a Manga cover with that though.
And it said that he pretty much sucked at playing that recorder, and that was when it was introduced that he was "tone-deaf". Gosho just re-arranged the facts later on for plot's sake.
Nyarl wrote:See, this is the lack of respect for Aoyama I'm complaining about. There's a very detailed explanation (Treyvoni's) about how Conan was never really portrayed as "tone deaf" in the thread, but we get "arbitrary retcon" posts anyway. Why bother writing detailed analysis if its going to be ignored or dismissed as fanwank out of hand? Dus is another "more Org, more Haibara, Ran sucks" type, too. Seems to me there's a correlation there. Honestly, why follow the series if you don't really respect the author? Why waste energy trying to explain things to wilful idiots?
Sure, it's probably a retcon in the sense that Aoyama didn't have every one of Shin'ichi's flaws in mind from chapter 1, but as early as the end of Moonlight Sonata he was following the piano code by ear rather than sheet music. He was NEVER shown to be "tone deaf". That's just some dumb thing Sonoko says (and might not be a literal enough translation of something more like "can't carry a tune").
It also wouldn't be a retcon if Shin'ichi beats the crap out of someone with some martial arts. The flying kick he tried the first time Ran had to save his ass in the series didn't look like a soccer tackle to me. But, I've banged my head against that wall already on these forums, too.


dilbertschalter wrote:Though I'm not going to change anyone's mind on this (I think I've made the argument before to no avail), I don't see why non-canon material can't be used for discussion of character traits. When it comes to the BO, using 13 as support for an argument should be shied away from because, even though it was made as to not contradict canon (iirc at least) and, similarly, the many ShinRan scenes in the movies don't mean much of anything as far as the romance plot of the manga is concerned. But when it comes to how well someone can sing or use a gun I just don't see much of a downside to using the movies as evidence.
kkslider5552000 wrote:Nyarl wrote:See, this is the lack of respect for Aoyama I'm complaining about. There's a very detailed explanation (Treyvoni's) about how Conan was never really portrayed as "tone deaf" in the thread, but we get "arbitrary retcon" posts anyway. Why bother writing detailed analysis if its going to be ignored or dismissed as fanwank out of hand? Dus is another "more Org, more Haibara, Ran sucks" type, too. Seems to me there's a correlation there. Honestly, why follow the series if you don't really respect the author? Why waste energy trying to explain things to wilful idiots?
Sure, it's probably a retcon in the sense that Aoyama didn't have every one of Shin'ichi's flaws in mind from chapter 1, but as early as the end of Moonlight Sonata he was following the piano code by ear rather than sheet music. He was NEVER shown to be "tone deaf". That's just some dumb thing Sonoko says (and might not be a literal enough translation of something more like "can't carry a tune").
It also wouldn't be a retcon if Shin'ichi beats the crap out of someone with some martial arts. The flying kick he tried the first time Ran had to save his ass in the series didn't look like a soccer tackle to me. But, I've banged my head against that wall already on these forums, too.
thanks, I've been wanting to use this again
Nyarl wrote:See, this is the lack of respect for Aoyama I'm complaining about. There's a very detailed explanation (Treyvoni's) about how Conan was never really portrayed as "tone deaf" in the thread, but we get "arbitrary retcon" posts anyway. Why bother writing detailed analysis if its going to be ignored or dismissed as fanwank out of hand? Dus is another "more Org, more Haibara, Ran sucks" type, too. Seems to me there's a correlation there. Honestly, why follow the series if you don't really respect the author? Why waste energy trying to explain things to wilful idiots?

JD- wrote:[...] Gosho is free to do what he wishes, but his work is far from being above criticism (much to the chagrin of some). [...] just because it can be explained away does not validate it as anything but lackluster and predictable plotting.
Nyarl wrote:Ah, the guy who gets to insult people and be an asshole because he sides with the consensus clique contributes nothing but dismissiveness to the discussion. Surprise, surprise.
Dus wrote:Well, I guess I have to apologise for saying it is retcon. Because it isn't. In volume 7, as you pointed out, Shinichi is shown as being quite capable of distinguishing different notes to the point that he can figure out a code based on it. At the same time we learn that he cannot read notes and has to ask Ran to do it for him. Then, in volume 8, we learn that he was completely incapable of learning to play the recorder. So he may have perfect pitch, but he doesn't have any musical abilities at all, because he just doesn't care about the subject.
Which may not make much sense, but is not really a contradiction. In the movies, however, he is shown as an avid and apt player of the violin. Which contradicts the canon and is BS.
In chapter 261, he asks Ran what notes the musical box is missing, but it's because Ran is familiar with the song in question and he is not. And at the end of the case, he demonstrates that he is familiar with both the Do-Re-MI and the I-Ro-Ha system of calling notes. He also knew that the b is called h in Germany. So he does have some theoretical knowledge about music and is able to read notes (which makes more sense, since that makes it easier to figure out the code in volume 7).Dus wrote:JD- wrote:[...] Gosho is free to do what he wishes, but his work is far from being above criticism (much to the chagrin of some). [...] just because it can be explained away does not validate it as anything but lackluster and predictable plotting.

Dus wrote:Well, I guess I have to apologise for saying it is retcon. Because it isn't. In volume 7, as you pointed out, Shinichi is shown as being quite capable of distinguishing different notes to the point that he can figure out a code based on it.

Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests