Yes you have a great point here but I have yet to see any evidence that proves they have a "having more-intimate-than-passing-acquaintances" relationship. And when you counter point is "It's possible the viewer isn't privy to that information just yet", that kinda shows that there really isn't any solid evidence.Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: Sorry to jump in someone else's argument, but using evidence to predict her actions and having more-intimate-than-passing-acquaintances knowledge of someone are not mutually exclusive. He could be using both.
I'm not going to lie. You have severely confused me.Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: Haibara was angling towards NOT going to the party, a move which would have defied Gin's predictions as he didn't take into account an accomplice of hers calling the shots, until Conan mentioned the APTX 4869 was at the party. Then she wanted to go.

This is actually my argument I used on Nyarl...and now I'm not sure if you are using it against me and for what reason.

I think I got what you meant and addressed it in my last post.Chekhov MacGuffin wrote: You might have missed it because of an edit conflict, but in my above post I noted that Gin didn't think Shiho would know about the party target since the "job" was arranged without her knowledge. If he expected her to know, precautions would have been taken or he might have considered planning a trap. And when he found out she knew, he did take precautions and plan a trap.