Ai Only

[Eve]

Finally, we are back on topic. That silly conia, trying to send all the Ai threads off-topic when he knows that only makes Ai smile.

So what's the topic? How Shiho probably filled Gin's juice with laxatives the day before she refused to continue research on the APTX4869?
That would explain why Gin hates her so much.

"Hold on Aniki, you just have to fight through it!"-Vodka standing outside of bathroom

"Dammit! Shut up Vodka!*censored noises*......I'll get even with you tomorrow Shiho...if I'm hydrated enough *more censored noises from bathroom"-Gin

"Aniki..do you need me to come in there?!"-Vodka

ROFL........

[Dus]

As it turns out, cross-reading some posts is NOT a good idea. Especially if the only words you read in a sentence are 'Shiho' and 'Gin's juice'.
Luckily, it turned out to be about Vodka wanting to be in the same toilet cabin as Gin.
Creepy either way.

[Eve]

As it turns out, cross-reading some posts is NOT a good idea. Especially if the only words you read in a sentence are 'Shiho' and 'Gin's juice'.
Luckily, it turned out to be about Vodka wanting to be in the same toilet cabin as Gin.
Creepy either way.

You've lost me at Gin's juice LOL.... reminds me of my zombie wedding

[Shuuichi Akai]

Eh...whats all this talk about shinran and Conia O_o

Don't be shy, join us!

Are you getting us off topic again?

No D:
At least I'm not trying. The intention is what it counts, right?

So you're saying its ok to kill someone as long as the intention was good ? O.-

As long as the intention is good, yes. Killing someone can never have a good intention.

Technically, yes it can. If I kill someone to protect another?? The intention is good but the action is not.

Yea... If you kill others at war, your intention is to protect your country.So, it isn't always bad.

[Detective Prince]

Killing is bad no matter what, humans just try to justify it has their "justice"

[xGinx]

Eh...whats all this talk about shinran and Conia O_o

Don't be shy, join us!

Are you getting us off topic again?

No D:
At least I'm not trying. The intention is what it counts, right?

So you're saying its ok to kill someone as long as the intention was good ? O.-

As long as the intention is good, yes. Killing someone can never have a good intention.

Technically, yes it can. If I kill someone to protect another?? The intention is good but the action is not.

Yea... If you kill others at war, your intention is to protect your country.So, it isn't always bad.

If Conan kills Gin for example, how would you take it?? You all know Conan's intentions are good and everything but, even killing Gin or Vodka or the BO Boss is a bad thing?? ... I'm not sure.

[ProfParanoia]

If Conan kills Gin for example, how would you take it?? You all know Conan's intentions are good and everything but, even killing Gin or Vodka or the BO Boss is a bad thing?? ... I'm not sure.

It would be bad, killing isn't in Conan's job, detective work is his business, the use of lethal force or capital punishment are the duties of others.

[Chekhov MacGuffin]

Killing is bad no matter what, humans just try to justify it has their "justice"

That said, you would be naive to think life is kind enough to always provide some alternative storybook choice where no one would get hurt. In a world where people are not perfect, choices which result in the death of another are made every day simply because there was no better alternative.

[Detective Prince]

Killing is bad no matter what, humans just try to justify it has their "justice"

That said, you would be naive to think life is kind enough to always provide some alternative storybook choice where no one would get hurt. In a world where people are not perfect, choices which result in the death of another are made every day simply because there was no better alternative.

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

[ProfParanoia]

Killing is bad no matter what, humans just try to justify it has their "justice"

That said, you would be naive to think life is kind enough to always provide some alternative storybook choice where no one would get hurt. In a world where people are not perfect, choices which result in the death of another are made every day simply because there was no better alternative.

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

Even then "justice" is the excuse for him, with gin or someone else in BO it's a little bit personal at least. I say shoot them, just not to kill if push seriously comes to shove.

[xGinx]

Killing is bad no matter what, humans just try to justify it has their "justice"

That said, you would be naive to think life is kind enough to always provide some alternative storybook choice where no one would get hurt. In a world where people are not perfect, choices which result in the death of another are made every day simply because there was no better alternative.

I never read better words to describe something like what we're talking about. Pure Wisdom for me. (I don't know if it sounded like a joke or not but I meant what I said before)

After living many years I can assure you that there's no such thing as Justice everywhere, there's too much corruption and as always the Money solves most of the problems.

[Chekhov MacGuffin]

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

On September 11th, 2001, the passengers of one United Airlines Flight 93 had their plane hijacked by terrorists intending to crash it into either the White House of the United States Capitol. Several of the passengers and crew called out in secret and learned that planes had been crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon earlier that day. With this knowledge, they decided to attack the hijackers in the cockpit knowing full well that they might fail to regain control of the aircraft and everyone on board could die. The plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania killing all aboard.
The actions of those who fought back directly resulted in the deaths of themselves, the hijackers, and the other passengers on the plane, but at the same time they prevented a greater loss of life and further tragedy. In those circumstances, could you say they were their actions were wrong? Are those passengers on board that flight who gave their lives to prevent additional deaths no different than someone who murders for pleasure?

[Detective Prince]

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

On September 11th, 2001, the passengers of one United Airlines Flight 93 had their plane hijacked by terrorists intending to crash it into either the White House of the United States Capitol. Several of the passengers and crew called out in secret and learned that planes had been crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon earlier that day. With this knowledge, they decided to attack the hijackers in the cockpit knowing full well that they might fail to regain control of the aircraft and everyone on board could die. The plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania killing all aboard.
The actions of those who fought back directly resulted in the deaths of themselves, the hijackers, and the other passengers on the plane, but at the same time they prevented a greater loss of life and further tragedy. In those circumstances, could you say they were their actions were wrong? Are those passengers on board that flight who gave their lives to prevent additional deaths no different than someone who murders for pleasure?

Not the person, just the act and it sounds like that wasn't even intentional wasn't that an accident?

[Eve]

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

On September 11th, 2001, the passengers of one United Airlines Flight 93 had their plane hijacked by terrorists intending to crash it into either the White House of the United States Capitol. Several of the passengers and crew called out in secret and learned that planes had been crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon earlier that day. With this knowledge, they decided to attack the hijackers in the cockpit knowing full well that they might fail to regain control of the aircraft and everyone on board could die. The plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania killing all aboard.
The actions of those who fought back directly resulted in the deaths of themselves, the hijackers, and the other passengers on the plane, but at the same time they prevented a greater loss of life and further tragedy. In those circumstances, could you say they were their actions were wrong? Are those passengers on board that flight who gave their lives to prevent additional deaths no different than someone who murders for pleasure?

Not the person, just the act and it sounds like that wasn't even intentional wasn't that an accident?

It was a Terrorist Attack, more than one attacks actually, resulted in Thousands of deaths, and you called it an accident?

[Detective Prince]

Wellll I said it was bad no matter what, but I didn't exactly said you shouldn't, I mean if there was no other choice, then whats done is done you had no alternative BUT I'm saying even if there was no other choice or you were doing it for "justice" it doesn't make it any right then if you were killing for pure pleasure.

On September 11th, 2001, the passengers of one United Airlines Flight 93 had their plane hijacked by terrorists intending to crash it into either the White House of the United States Capitol. Several of the passengers and crew called out in secret and learned that planes had been crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon earlier that day. With this knowledge, they decided to attack the hijackers in the cockpit knowing full well that they might fail to regain control of the aircraft and everyone on board could die. The plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania killing all aboard.
The actions of those who fought back directly resulted in the deaths of themselves, the hijackers, and the other passengers on the plane, but at the same time they prevented a greater loss of life and further tragedy. In those circumstances, could you say they were their actions were wrong? Are those passengers on board that flight who gave their lives to prevent additional deaths no different than someone who murders for pleasure?

Not the person, just the act and it sounds like that wasn't even intentional wasn't that an accident?

It was a Terrorist Attack, more than one attacks actually, resulted in Thousands of deaths, and you called it an accident?

I mean the fact that it crashed somewhere else or I'm probably reading this wrong