leokiko wrote:Just passing by in support to SOPA:
WIN
leokiko wrote:Just passing by in support to SOPA:
leokiko wrote:Just passing by in support to SOPA:

Not quite right, GEMA doesn't block the videos; YouTube does so, at GEMA's request, and it does so based on very old law, not due to any recent developments concerning copyrightsJd- wrote:Europe is already not safe from blanket bans. What GEMA has done with YouTube videos in Germany is its own crime, but it has gone on for years and they can't seem to be stopped. GEMA is able to "legally" block any music-based video on YouTube that's put up by any record label, even if they do not have any presence whatsoever in Germany. GEMA should not have the right to block videos uploaded by music labels that they do not even represent. If SOPA or PIPA were to pass and media companies lobbied other governments around the world (which they absolutely would), there would be an undeniable domino effect. Pretending that the EU is somehow immune isn't inclusive of reality--the way several European countries are already punishing "pirates" is indication enough (France's three-strike policy is about as wrong as anyone could ask for, not to mention the enormous sums of money that others, including the U.K., are sinking into anti-piracy) that they are well in the pockets of the media conglomerates already. They will always feel justified in doing so, too, because the idea of "piracy" as it stands in legal terms is something that warrants legislation. The problem is they can't figure out how to do it yet, and in the meantime, we're all going to suffer for it.


,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:Not quite right, GEMA doesn't block the videos; YouTube does so, at GEMA's request, and it does so based on very old law, not due to any recent developments concerning copyrights
But yeah, I get what you mean
Dunno why they would do the White House's page, though. I mean, the Obama Administration is against both acts if I remember correctly...

mangaluva wrote:I assume Anonymous did it because they could. They are, after all, all trolls looking for acceptable targets to troll

kkslider5552000 wrote:hahahahahahahahahahaha
i was hoping for this. Pissing off anonymous: not a good idea.

IHKF wrote:Just one thing....
WHY THE HECK CAN'T THEY FOCUS ON SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IMPORTANT?!


miakakiri wrote:IHKF wrote:Just one thing....
WHY THE HECK CAN'T THEY FOCUS ON SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IMPORTANT?!
Such as?
Either they're morons or they think this is actually important. You decide which. :p


IHKF wrote:Just one thing....
WHY THE HECK CAN'T THEY FOCUS ON SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IMPORTANT?!
Kor wrote:IHKF wrote:Just one thing....
WHY THE HECK CAN'T THEY FOCUS ON SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IMPORTANT?!
It's extremely important for the lobbying groups and some rich individuals and company.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests