



ConansSideWalk wrote:What a sticky situation



aly_angelflight wrote:I personally support gay getting married in a marriage of state... you know, the marriage with the Justice of the Peace at the courthouse that makes you recognized by the LAW as being married (with all of its legal benefits and drawbacks)? Marrying through the "church" (and by that, I'm blanketing all organized religions that actually have wedding rituals) just means you asked whatever god(s) you worship to recognize the bond of matrimony between the two of you, and he/she/they agreed to do so. The Christian God doesn't recognize marriage unless it's between a man and a woman, so you simply can't get married in the Christian church if you're homosexual.
(Really, marriage of state shouldn't have to concede to the rules of a religious marriage... >_>)


dilbertschalter wrote:"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
mill rules.

Tawi wrote:IHKF wrote:Tawi wrote:Being a homosexual? No. Engaging in homosexual activities? Yes. ;D
Catholic and proud of it!
I am... confused. XD
There's nothing wrong about being a homosexual but when one engages in homosexual activities that's when things go wrong...at least for me.
Abs. wrote:Tawi wrote:IHKF wrote:Tawi wrote:Being a homosexual? No. Engaging in homosexual activities? Yes.
Catholic and proud of it!
I am... confused. XD
There's nothing wrong about being a homosexual but when one engages in homosexual activities that's when things go wrong...at least for me.
See, but what you ended up saying was:
"It's not okay to be homosexual, but it's okay to engage in homosexual activities, WOOOOOOO YEAHHHHHHH!"

Abs. wrote:Tawi wrote:IHKF wrote:Tawi wrote:Being a homosexual? No. Engaging in homosexual activities? Yes. ;D
Catholic and proud of it!
I am... confused. XD
There's nothing wrong about being a homosexual but when one engages in homosexual activities that's when things go wrong...at least for me.
See, but what you ended up saying was:
"It's not okay to be homosexual, but it's okay to engage in homosexual activities, WOOOOOOO YEAHHHHHHH!"
aly_angelflight wrote:I personally support gay getting married in a marriage of state... you know, the marriage with the Justice of the Peace at the courthouse that makes you recognized by the LAW as being married (with all of its legal benefits and drawbacks)? Marrying through the "church" (and by that, I'm blanketing all organized religions that actually have wedding rituals) just means you asked whatever god(s) you worship to recognize the bond of matrimony between the two of you, and he/she/they agreed to do so. The Christian God doesn't recognize marriage unless it's between a man and a woman, so you simply can't get married in the Christian church if you're homosexual.
(Really, marriage of state shouldn't have to concede to the rules of a religious marriage... >_>)

Callid wrote:Also, considering the bible argument:
It may be that (some?) Christians believe homosexuality is immoral, but considering that countries are (or at least, definitely should be) independent of religion, the doctrine of a particular religion is completely irrelevant to the law, just like it is to anyone not part of said religion. Even if 99.9% of the people in that country follow this one religion, it shouldn't be of any significance.

GinRei wrote:PhoenixTears wrote:And, just my personal opinion, we need to focus more on taking care of the children without families, rather than bringing more people into the world.
Stop making sense, we're talking about religion here.


Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests