Homosexuality: A Survey

If you have some randomness to share that you can't post elsewhere, this is the place to do it.

Is homosexuality acceptable for you?

Yes
69
71%
No
20
21%
Undecided
8
8%
 
Total votes: 97
Akonyl
Community Hero
User avatar
Posts: 4118

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Akonyl » December 27th, 2011, 2:44 am

Tawi wrote:How can an all loving God damn people to hell?

Here's my take on things...

Assuming we do end up in hell, we did so on our own intentions. God is not to blame, we are, he laid out the rules yet we consciously refused to follow them using our own free will. Think of it this way, a judge in a courtroom has sentenced a criminal for life imprisonment. The criminal may be a good person but regardless, he broke the law and has to suffer the consequences.

The judge in that example is also not all-loving. :P
Tawi
Posts: 15

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Tawi » December 27th, 2011, 2:48 am

No, you see, the judge and the criminal are childhood friends and did a lot of things together. When the judge landed the hammer, he felt sad for his dear friend but he had to do it. Justice is justice. 8-)
ProfParanoia
User avatar

Check 'Em!

Posts: 3338

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby ProfParanoia » December 27th, 2011, 2:51 am

Tawi wrote:No, you see, the judge and the criminal are childhood friends and did a lot of things together. When the judge landed the hammer, he felt sad for his dear friend but he had to do it. Justice is justice. 8-)
So you're peers vote on if you go to hell or not?
Image
ryan2thev
Tawi
Posts: 15

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Tawi » December 27th, 2011, 2:54 am

ProfParanoia wrote:
Tawi wrote:No, you see, the judge and the criminal are childhood friends and did a lot of things together. When the judge landed the hammer, he felt sad for his dear friend but he had to do it. Justice is justice. 8-)
So you're peers vote on if you go to hell or not?

Stop nit-picking my analogy o_o
ProfParanoia
User avatar

Check 'Em!

Posts: 3338

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby ProfParanoia » December 27th, 2011, 2:55 am

Tawi wrote:
ProfParanoia wrote:
Tawi wrote:No, you see, the judge and the criminal are childhood friends and did a lot of things together. When the judge landed the hammer, he felt sad for his dear friend but he had to do it. Justice is justice. 8-)
So you're peers vote on if you go to hell or not?

Stop nit-picking my analogy o_o

That does it, I'm appealing my damnation to the State Supreme Court of Titan Gods. Does the court allow one month for me to set up my case?
Last edited by ProfParanoia on December 27th, 2011, 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
ryan2thev
PhoenixTears
Community Mad Scientist
User avatar

to cammel's bav we go!

Posts: 1611

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby PhoenixTears » December 27th, 2011, 3:03 am

@Ako:
Sorry I am running on little sleep and have been up for way too long. Let me see if I can explain it a little clearer: it's not that I see homosexuality as a choice (remember I said I see it as more of a fluid thing that changes or doesn't change with each specific person). I'm hoping for a time when a person's choice of partner doesn't matter to anyone except the people directly involved, when people don't look at something and think about it being a man with a man or a woman with a woman or a man with a woman, but instead, they see a person in love with another person and that's all that matters.

Hopefully that makes more sense. ^^;

To be fair though, I do think people get too caught up on gender though. :-X Just my opinion.
Last edited by PhoenixTears on December 27th, 2011, 3:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
FC: 5327-1945-9777 | The FC Thread | The Forum Mafia Topic | DCTP ORAS Secret Bases
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
ProfParanoia
User avatar

Check 'Em!

Posts: 3338

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby ProfParanoia » December 27th, 2011, 3:10 am

PT: Given how society is always moving in the right direction on it's own, I think that homosexuality will be more widely excepted as you want PT. Black x White marriage was illegal in a number of states just a few decades ago, and now society born after that mentality can't imagine a world with such discriminant laws, the same will come of homosexual marriage soon enough.
Image
ryan2thev
Akonyl
Community Hero
User avatar
Posts: 4118

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Akonyl » December 27th, 2011, 3:24 am

PhoenixTears wrote:I'm hoping for a time when a person's choice of partner doesn't matter to anyone except the people directly involved,

gotcha, figured that was the case but it sounded a fair bit like the other case. :P

also what are you still doing up, thought you went to sleep an hour or two ago :V
ConansSideWalk
User avatar

Trying To Take Over The World!

Posts: 39

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby ConansSideWalk » December 27th, 2011, 3:25 am

@Prof The problem is how long do people have to wait to see the changes we already know are correct right now? Goodnight lady below
Last edited by ConansSideWalk on December 27th, 2011, 3:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage

Representing The Place I Love For The People Who Inhabit It. SOS団 Forever
PhoenixTears
Community Mad Scientist
User avatar

to cammel's bav we go!

Posts: 1611

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby PhoenixTears » December 27th, 2011, 3:41 am

I said goodnight, not that I was gonna sleep. :P I've been up finishing a book.
FC: 5327-1945-9777 | The FC Thread | The Forum Mafia Topic | DCTP ORAS Secret Bases
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
Jd-
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

Deportation applications available.

Posts: 6101

Contact:

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Jd- » December 27th, 2011, 5:27 am

Tawi wrote:[Long post that again completely avoided the challenge at hand and also erroneously made assumptions as far as my position while responding exactly as I predicted you would in the post itself] - Tawi


The previous challenge is replicated below for reference's sake:

Jd- wrote:If you want a debate, respond to every bit of my former post in detail, point by point, with no outside links. Quotes from links are fine, but linking to outside articles that retain only a cursory bearing on the subject at hand is not. I will not respond to any further post of yours, including one replying to what I've said above in this post, until my original post is addressed because it feels as if you are completely avoiding the issue throughout this topic. You aren't actually responding to anything and instead are just making excuses from start to finish. Actively avoiding every criticism and only "directly" responding to what you feel is something you can defend without relying on specifics makes your argument weaker, not stronger. I don't have time to run in circles with you--I leave the circular logic to the apologists, because they've made an art form out of avoiding reality.


You are picking and choosing your battles like you're picking and choosing your gospels, to be honest. Or, as Tanner put it:

Tanner-kun wrote:Im prety sure when Jd- said dark ages, he just refereed to a era. So must of that was a pointless arguemeant. and again you are just avoide what you cant argue against and only saying arguments to the points you can defend.


I'm not going to run in circles--that's a trap that many people fall into in such situations. If I compose responses to all of your misdirection, you'll be able to successfully avoid responding to anything, in full or in part. You are the one pushing an agenda on other people--if you truly, honestly believe in it, you should have no problem offering a reasonable, logically-sound, point-by-point rebuttal of everything I said in the post in question.
bluekaitou1412
Community Phantom
User avatar
Posts: 5333

Contact:

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby bluekaitou1412 » December 27th, 2011, 6:45 am

I had fun reading the thread. :P
Lalalalalala
GinRei
DCTP Staff Member
User avatar

銀霊

Posts: 3388

Contact:

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby GinRei » December 27th, 2011, 7:10 am

Tawi wrote:I took the time to study my own faith and I'm sure others did as well so don't go making that sweeping statement.


For having studied your own faith, you sure don't seem to be able to debate your own arguments with any level of logic or science.

Also, it'd be nice if you stopped lumping everyone who isn't catholic or has anything to say about the Bible that you don't agree with in as atheist.  Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them a godless heathen.
IHKF

AyuCon forever & other INTERESTING couples :3

Posts: 1249

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby IHKF » December 27th, 2011, 7:15 am

bluekaitou1412 wrote:I had fun reading the thread. :P


.... I would imagine it would be rather entertaining when you're not one of the people arguing. XD
Definition of AyuCon:
An underrated couple overthrown by a mass of overrated couples in a world of fangirls/boys who like stoic characters and Mary-Sues.

"Please be okay... Ayumi!" -Conan
Definition of MitsuAi:
Best thing ever- better than ice tea on a hot day or ice cream cake at a B-Day party.

"(to Mitsuhiko) At this moment, you are my outstanding rescuer. Thanks for your help." -Haibara

Image
(Don't own the picture)
Tawi
Posts: 15

Re: Homosexuality: A Survey

Postby Tawi » December 27th, 2011, 8:31 am

As for those condescending remarks toward other Christians: Catholics are more stubborn than Protestants--not more wise or more informed. From my experience, they, more so than any other, tend to indulge in mass delusions and refuse to acknowledge any other worldview and, when challenged, tend to use misdirection to avoid considering any sort of actual facts or evidence.

I have no idea where you got that idea from but head over to CAF and you'll find the complete opposite.

Catholics, for example, continue to respect and worship a Pope that deliberately and systematically covers up the rape of young children and threatens anyone wanting to come forward with full excommunication.

We don't worship the Pope, that's basic Catechism. As for Pope deliberately covering up the rape of young children, that's a strong claim and strong claims demand hard evidence. No one disagrees with you that the Church is facing major sex abuse scandals these days but saying the Pope covered-up these incidents is a wild claim. As far as I know, the problem is Church's poor handling of these incidents. That's why the Vatican is working on a series of guidelines directed at bishops around the world, advising them how to handle such cases.

That's a holy man if I've ever seen one (no sarcasm, actually). And thanks to his stance on contraception, there will be more death on his hands by the time he dies than any mass murderer in history, and the body count will continue to rise long after he's dead. The Catholic Church could use its influence for good for once if they would stop living in the Dark Ages.

Contraception is another argument. If you're really concerned on the issue of mass murder you should start speaking out against abortion.

If the link you provided is an meant to serve as an example of how Catholics are superior to Protestants in debate... I can only submit this instance as evidence of my theory that Catholics tend to be far more convinced of their own eminence than any other religious group I've come across.

Look, I hold CAF up high for a lot of reasons. It hasn't only helped me in discovering my faith, it helped a lot of other people as well. I've been there for over a year and in my stay I'd say the place gathers hardcore believers of different groups. Another thing I noticed, in other Christian forums, atheists seem to go troll mode. This doesn't apply to CAF however, atheists do not troll, instead, they engage in intellectual debates. I'll agree that the environment of CAF is borderline hostile but I find it an amazing place for intellectual discussion. There's a reason why the forum has so many hardcore atheists, a lot of whom, even have over a thousand posts. Most notably, Spock and Bohm Banweck to name a few. CAF is open and actually encourages non-believers to criticize the faith. Watching posts during my stay there has turned me into a fanboy, I consider it my religious DCTP. Philosophy, Evolution, Historical controversies, I'll vouch for CAF's intelligibility any day.

If you want a debate, respond to every bit of my former post in detail, point by point, with no outside links.


In case you didn't see it.
if you read my post awhile back. I conceded and said I was gonna end my presence here by listing a few points I wanted to push. Unfortunately, posts kept coming and I was provoked to responding. But now, I think I should get on my first thesis paper. I was planning on starting after the Lakers game and using the next three days to do it (its only 6-8 pages). But If I continue to post here, I'll probably have to cram my paper. Which I don't want to do because for the first time this year, I'm doing below average in English. It's one of the few good subjects I'm good at and I don't want it to go down. Believe me, had I the time, I could have replied to almost every claim directed towards my stance. With the help of CAF and a good cathechism, ntohing's impossible really. But of course,  I'm no apologist and I can't answer everything in a way that would satisfy your expectations. If you really want to debate with other Catholics, feel free to visit a Catholic forum (I know a good one too). My aim in my last few posts was to get out all the main points I wanted to share and push. After I did that, I could care less. I don't have the time to respond in a thread with majority of its posters against my stance. I said my part and I'm satisfied. If you think I'm dodging what I can't answer that's what you believe but please understand my situation as well.


If you did see it but believe I'm dorking around dodging comments then I don't have a problem with that. Everything in that post was sincere and true. Look, at the moment, time isn't really on my side. I'm a slow writer, my thesis topic is something I don't like at all - Macbeth and I definitely don't want to cram such an important paper over the last few days of break. Given the amount of response towards my comments, I conceded a while back. And while the posts were written charitably, they were provoking as well so I had to come back. But since I couldn't answer everyone, I decided to answer and push out everything I wanted to share with others to the point where my obsessive compulsiveness would be satisfied. In fact, coming back to check on the thread, I feel like posting one more thing to clarify my beliefs. I hate to break the peace, it's just something I want to be clear on, I want to set a stand for people who share my stance. I'm not satisfied with my vague paragraph answer a few pages back nor my scattered posts throughout the topic. I'll be summarizing my thoughts later in this post.

Jd, I'm also no apologist, I try to be one and stand up for my faith but I'm not as good as my fellow brother and sisters are over the net. If I were to engage into a debate with you, I'd most definitely lose, but that doesn't make you right either. I love standing out for what I believe in, and it's a trait that sparks a lot of discussion. However, I'm not the kind of person person who is willing to commit into actual debates that require a lot of time in effort. Sure, I can do it at CAF because there are people backing me up, inspiring me and lessening the load of questions in the process, but its different here. While I do have a strong urge to talk to everybody here with inquiries and whatnots about my faith, it's also degrading. I can't answer everyone, I'm the only one speaking for my cause and I have a lot of better things to do with my time - games, fantasy basketball, friends, etc. It's encouraging at first but eventually speaking here becomes tiring and tedious. Don't get me wrong, I love speaking my mind out over here. I just don't have the dedication to do that right now. Had I been free of my thesis I probably could have response to your posts. But in the long run, I would have conceded things either way. My thesis only complicates things a whole lot more.
Last edited by Tawi on December 27th, 2011, 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Return to “Off-Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests