
what's that? Kaito lady x xpon?Kaito Lady wrote:Thank goodnes i'm not on that list
Parkur wrote:what's that? Kaito lady x xpon?Kaito Lady wrote:Thank goodnes i'm not on that list

Parkur wrote:Whoa now, no need to be a yandere :V


,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.

I don't really have any quarrel with myself, so...Kaito Lady wrote:youre also paired with yourself
XD
,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.

Yeah. It's almost surprising that these pairings are here, while CallidxConia is absentKaito Lady wrote:XD youre also paired up with prof and xpon

,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.
that belongs in callid's "true pairings" topicKaito Lady wrote:Parkur!!!we need a callidxconia pairing!!!!! XD
Nope, it doesn't. Despite having no grounding, it would also need both Conia and me to agree on it, which is, for obvious reasons (duh), not quite likely to happenParkur wrote:that belongs in callid's "true pairings" topicKaito Lady wrote:Parkur!!!we need a callidxconia pairing!!!!! XD

,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:Nope, it doesn't. Despite having no grounding, it would also need both Conia and me to agree on it, which is, for obvious reasons (duh), not quite likely to happenParkur wrote:that belongs in callid's "true pairings" topicKaito Lady wrote:Parkur!!!we need a callidxconia pairing!!!!! XD

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests