
So, what's the English male-only term then?

,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously."Gay"Callid wrote:Seriously? "Gay" can refer to both?
So, what's the English male-only term then?
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
So, "guy" can mean both male only and both? Or it means male only, but is used for both in slang? Or does it truly mean male only, and nom's classmates were right? (Not to mention it seems likely they talked Swedish to begin with, so unless Swedish is like English in this point, they made no mistake anyway)PhoenixTears wrote:"Gay"Callid wrote:Seriously? "Gay" can refer to both?
So, what's the English male-only term then?
It's like Ako said:
Lesbian = girlxgirl
Gay = guyxguy
Homosexual = either
But "gay" has kind of become the catch-all for it.
,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:So, "guy" can mean both male only and both?

I meant "gay"Akonyl wrote:Callid wrote:So, "guy" can mean both male only and both?
iunno, generally "guy" means you're a male


)
)
,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:I meant "gay"
Not to mention that, IIRC, , a while ago, you taught me that "guy" could refer to a female as well, so...
(We should make a "The Mysteries of the English Language"-thread)

Callid wrote:Not to mention that, IIRC, , a while ago, you taught me that "guy" could refer to a female as well, so...
OK, so:Akonyl wrote:Callid wrote:I meant "gay"
Not to mention that, IIRC, , a while ago, you taught me that "guy" could refer to a female as well, so...
(We should make a "The Mysteries of the English Language"-thread)
I'm aware
and I don't doubt that I did, but when did I say that? I may have said "guys" can refer to groups that may or may not have females in it, but generally you don't call one girl a guy.
,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Essentially.Callid wrote:OK, so:
malexmale OR femalexfemale = gay
malexmale, BUT NOT femalexfemale = gay
males AND females = guys
therefore: females = guys
one male = guy
one female != guy
So, nom is not a guy, but nom and Kain are guys, yet I am a guy on my own, and nom and me are also guys, as are Conia and me.
Also, ParkurxAkonyl (XD) and Shinxalice are gay pairings, but in another meaning of gay, ParkurxAkonyl is still a gay pairing, but Shinxalice isn't.
Is that correct?

^ Except that you can't say "nom and Kain are guys" because that's still confusing.Commi-Ninja wrote:Essentially.Callid wrote:OK, so:
malexmale OR femalexfemale = gay
malexmale, BUT NOT femalexfemale = gay
males AND females = guys
therefore: females = guys
one male = guy
one female != guy
So, nom is not a guy, but nom and Kain are guys, yet I am a guy on my own, and nom and me are also guys, as are Conia and me.
Also, ParkurxAkonyl (XD) and Shinxalice are gay pairings, but in another meaning of gay, ParkurxAkonyl is still a gay pairing, but Shinxalice isn't.
Is that correct?
Well, yeah, but you could say that "those guys" are doing something and refer to a group of girls with no real problem. It's just meant to be sort of vague. XDAbs. wrote:^ Except that you can't say "nom and Kain are guys" because that's still confusing.
Akonyl wrote:here's the main thing: It's conversational english. It's not an exact science.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests