

Parkur wrote:DAMMIT MANGA, I HAD KILLED THIS! >:(
xpon wrote:
See and cry!. Now she is mine!


Schillok wrote:She is not. You are just a plush toy to her. No... matter... how... envious... it... makes... me... feel.

I have to agree with Parkur here, as we all aren't going to convince Schillok, no matter how hard we try, and neither will he, if the last 60 pages are any indication. Actually, this thread was, one could say, rightfully dead. Now it's just endless, senseless discussion all over again -.-Parkur wrote:DAMMIT MANGA, I HAD KILLED THIS! >:(
,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:I have to agree with Parkur here, as we all aren't going to convince Schillok, no matter how hard we try, and neither will he, if the last 60 pages are any indication. Actually, this thread was, one could say, rightfully dead. Now it's just endless, senseless discussion all over again -.-Parkur wrote:DAMMIT MANGA, I HAD KILLED THIS! >:(
(While discussions are not bad in general, I think the best thing we'll get out of this one is that we agree to disagree...)

Have you seen me in any other pairing thread in, uh, the last year?Schillok wrote:Callid wrote:I have to agree with Parkur here, as we all aren't going to convince Schillok, no matter how hard we try, and neither will he, if the last 60 pages are any indication. Actually, this thread was, one could say, rightfully dead. Now it's just endless, senseless discussion all over again -.-Parkur wrote:DAMMIT MANGA, I HAD KILLED THIS! >:(
(While discussions are not bad in general, I think the best thing we'll get out of this one is that we agree to disagree...)
Well, that point would apply to all fan topics then. Just because other pairing threads have more posters to keep them on the top page - usually with the same useless and endless discussion/self-praise/off-topicness - doesn't mean that this one has no right to exist or that people should not be allowed to post in them if they desire to do so.


,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Callid wrote:Have you seen me in any other pairing thread in, uh, the last year?
I agree, discussions on the validity of pairings do not make a lot of sense. Especially not if it's just one person arguing with everyone else

ProfParanoia wrote:Ha ha ha! *kicks over sand castle*

*throws tools into nearby lake*Schillok wrote:ProfParanoia wrote:Ha ha ha! *kicks over sand castle*
Pft, I am used to this kind of behavior. Building the castle is more fun than looking at it anyway.

*throws Prof in said lake*ProfParanoia wrote:*throws tools into nearby lake*Schillok wrote:ProfParanoia wrote:Ha ha ha! *kicks over sand castle*
Pft, I am used to this kind of behavior. Building the castle is more fun than looking at it anyway.

,
,
,
,
,
,
or >:D are attached, that paragraph may not be 100% serious. Seriously.Parkur wrote:DAMMIT MANGA, I HAD KILLED THIS! >:(

There has to be at least 3 of us. XDCallid wrote:just one person arguing with everyone else
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests