Listen, don't get mad.xpon wrote: FINE! i dont care any more.

After today, I'll know who else I can trust enough to explain them to in more detail and we can figure out what's actually going on. (Well, that is unless I'm lynched.)
Listen, don't get mad.xpon wrote: FINE! i dont care any more.
I don't believe they're active cause you state so, you could be lying. I believe it cause Conia pointed out that they aren't arrested yet. Proof vs. Statement, And I didn't state you're lynching based on hunches... I simply asked for you to post the evidence that supports your accusations.xpon wrote: well.. now i told you right? they are active. and we do have a evidence.
do you think i will lynch someone based on hunch only? if i do that.. Moho is the one i vote every day :P
pofa is female XD, but anyways. Xpon said he had evidence on pofa and(?) Kain, if he actually posted 'em then I'd be more cooperative. And why do you think pofa and Kain are suspicious?Schillok wrote: I am not sure about lynching pofa anymore. Xpon is known for jumping to conclusions too quick. Although he is sometimes right and pofa IS kinda suspicious.
Still, since pofa agreed to cooperate maybe we should give him a second chance? There is still Kain who is just as suspicious in my opinion.
Now that's just nonsense, xpon... It is clear you want to lynch him based only on you just getting mad right nowxpon wrote: lynch schillok!!!!!!!!!
Either that or it's one of his bad "jokes" againConia wrote:Now that's just nonsense, xpon... It is clear you want to lynch him based only on you just getting mad right nowxpon wrote: lynch schillok!!!!!!!!!You're a trusted townie, it seems, so help us out here.
Conia wrote:Now that's just nonsense, xpon... It is clear you want to lynch him based only on you just getting mad right nowxpon wrote: lynch schillok!!!!!!!!!You're a trusted townie, it seems, so help us out here.
I'm confused. Conia didn't say anything about anyone, except Schillok. So why are you asking about "Kain"? Unless you're referring to his earlier post.xpon wrote: @conia
who? kain?
What evidence shows her as BO? And is she inactive atm?Conia wrote: I guess I'll go with Kain, she was mentioned earlier, and more than once too, and never defended herself. I'm just hoping she really isn't a townie who unluckily went inactive at a bad time![]()