Mafia Round 56: April Fools and Nintendo don't Mix ( Day 6 TOWN WINS! )

[Iwamoto Yuri]

or we have an awesome healer/protector

[PT]

I trust myself 100%
And considering I was attacked and saved night 1 and a BO was caught who should have been responsible for the attack I think we can all agree my statement is true. Why would the BO blame themselves? That's not logical.
Also, no BO member would attack anokata :V

I would attack anokata if I were BO if that get me or a BO buddy some trust in town :V

On night 1?

Night 1 is the BEST night to do it. Before anyone really allies anyone else and starts proving each other, you have a chance to jump in and get a head start at forming alliances in the town and learning as much as you can. And I was thinking exactly the same thing as Kleene (and Conia).

I dunno, I'm actually more worried about BO/Town lovers. Considering how two consecutive kills failed, I think it's more plausible than a ploy to get Anokata to infiltrate the town. But who knows.

And I'm worried about this too.

or we have an awesome healer/protector

You're awfully defensive for someone who is probably town. :V

[Kaito Lady]

I question those of you who didn't vote and/or voted for someone other than Raifuujin.

So... Yuri, KL, Stop, Trickster, Phantom, Meme... what's the deal? :V

Especially you, Yuri. Didn't feel like lynching your attacker?

I was offline the whole weekend till now

also, that will was awesome XD

[Iwamoto Yuri]

I'm being defensive because I'm town... And I was giving an option <_<




Nevermind, why bother, you guys find a way to make everything I say suspicious, so I guess I could as well just say nothing at all.
That's mafia for ya.

[PT]

Oh dear lord. That was a joke, you know?

Also OMG PT IS SUSPICIOUS OF SOMEONE. THIS IS NEW. THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE.

And yes, being suspicious of people is part of mafia. Did it really take you that long to figure it out?

[KangarooGirl]

Well here's a theory: Yuri is a BO disguised as Agasa night 1. KaiRai attacks her (so that if Yuri was SO'd an attack would show) and BO blames someone else. After Night 2 Bourbon or someone "in contact with" Bourbon releases that blamed person attacked Yuri and blamed person is lynched However we managed to find KaiRai who actually attacked Yuri (she wouldn't have the BS to fake it as Akemi) so blamed person escaped alive and well.

Also Anokata is in the game according to a source.

[Stopwatch]

Well here's a theory: Yuri is a BO disguised as Agasa night 1. KaiRai attacks her (so that if Yuri was SO'd an attack would show) and BO blames someone else. After Night 2 Bourbon or someone "in contact with" Bourbon releases that blamed person attacked Yuri and blamed person is lynched However we managed to find KaiRai who actually attacked Yuri (she wouldn't have the BS to fake it as Akemi) so blamed person escaped alive and well.

Also Anokata is in the game according to a source.

Wouldn't an attack show if it was just blame though?

[PT]

On a similar vein, it could be Conia that's BO instead. If Agasa gives Conia the watch for N2, then, of course, the BO might decide to have him be attacked that night - and potentially by a sniper to destroy the watch, also - and thus make him out to be town.

Just another potential situation.

Do I think this is likely to have happened? Not really. Same for the Iwa situation. But it IS a possibility.

Wouldn't an attack show if it was just blame though?

It would, but unlikely the BO would blame their own member for it.

[KangarooGirl]

Afaik not in FM rules. On Akobo it does, I know that. But yeah, if I remember correctly (Yuriko correct me if I'm wrong) blamed actions don't show on SO

RM'd by PT: It doesn't??

[PT]

Checking with the GM now. :x

[Conia]

Poor GM

[Kleene Onigiri]

Why wouldn't a blamed action show up on SO while a faked one does? :V

[PT]

According to GM, Blamed actions do not show up on SO. Faked ones do, however.

[Conia]

Why wouldn't a blamed action show up on SO while a faked one does? :V

Probably because the main purpose of a faked action is to be caught by actions like Inv or SO, while Blamed actions' purpose is to give crimes to townies. If Blamed actions were traceable like that too, fake actions would be obsolete. That's my opinion as to why the rules are like that.

[Kleene Onigiri]

Good to know (should be clarified in the rules I guess? I didn't find anything about that in the rules)

RMed by Conia:
But you can only blame for crimes, and you'd want to do that for townies. You wouldn't want to give your BO-buddies a crime :V (since faked actions aren't crimes afaik)