Mafia Round 28: League of Legends - Judgment (Townies Win!)

[Stopwatch]

Nope, any leads on who to lynch though? If we accidently get a Townie then it could be pretty bad...

[xpon]

Okay... it is time for xpon report part 2:

Info:
- Breva is stolen from on night 1.
- Moho is stolen from on night 1.
- Mystery is stolen from on night 2.
- Gin is in the game

Fact:
- Kid is dead on night 1

Conclusion:
- The BO have Akemi and Calvados or Akemi and Anokata
- If breva and Moho tell the truth then they are Town for sure.
- because up until now only 1 steal happen in night 2. (and breva didnt get stolen on night 2 like i suspect it) i kinda sure that the BO only have Anokata & Akemi. Not Calvados & Akemi


so who to vote?

[Mohorovicic]

so who to vote?

Whoever is BO, of course.

[xpon]

Okay, If you are reading this post and BO in this round, please post your self here so we can vote you!!!

thanks

[Kleene Onigiri]

If no leads appear, I'll vote xpon because he's acting strange and unlogical.

[xpon]

kleene try to vote me while schillok try to frame me..

just like usual!!!!

fine.. do what you like i dont care. i just pointing out my reasoning and this is what i get?

but please dont vote meme, breva, lynz, pofa, conia, yuriko and moho.

thanks

[Mohorovicic]

If no leads appear, I'll vote xpon because he's acting strange and unlogical.

Doesn't he normally do that?

[Schillok]

kleene try to vote me while schillok try to frame me..

just like usual!!!!

fine.. do what you like i dont care. i just pointing out my reasoning and this is what i get?

but please dont vote meme, breva, lynz, pofa, conia, yuriko and moho.

thanks

It is not just because of your "reasoning". From the feedback I got about you there is someone claiming that you could be BO based on a result which that player got.
I mean, unless something better turns up I would go with that instead of trusting "hunches" or random  lynchings hoping to get a BO by chance or tie the vote.

[Conia]

(and breva didnt get stolen)

Wait, so she lied about getting stolen? Or is it just a typo?

[Stopwatch]

It is not just because of your "reasoning". From the feedback I got about you there is someone claiming that you could be BO based on a result which that player got.
I mean, unless something better turns up I would go with that instead of trusting "hunches" or random  lynchings hoping to get a BO by chance or tie the vote.

Hmm... if we agree on two people and sort out who's voting who we might get away with a tie 'cause the Org would give themselves away if they don't go along with it. But doesn't APTX affect the votes if they get someone...? Or does no one think they've got enough info for that yet...
Basically, attempting a tie is risky, I think we should wait for a lead for as long as possible.
And, what was the result that made xpon suspicious? If you can ask whoever told you 'bout it to PM me, or you can pass it on if you don't want me to know who discovered it... If it was an interrogation though, isn't Gin in the game? Have any Stakeouters seen any Slanders to confirm his exsistence?

[Schillok]

Hmm... if we agree on two people and sort out who's voting who we might get away with a tie 'cause the Org would give themselves away if they don't go along with it. But doesn't APTX affect the votes if they get someone...? Or does no one think they've got enough info for that yet...
Basically, attempting a tie is risky, I think we should wait for a lead for as long as possible.

It could work later in the game, but not at this stage. You will hardly get everyone to vote like you suggest, and a single player forgetting to vote, a BO player "forgetting to vote", a Tequila frighten, poison, arrest, etc. to stop that plan. Random draws are okay. But planing for them... has too many weaknesses.

And, what was the result that made xpon suspicious? If you can ask whoever told you 'bout it to PM me, or you can pass it on if you don't want me to know who discovered it... If it was an interrogation though, isn't Gin in the game? Have any Stakeouters seen any Slanders to confirm his exsistence?

Yeah, a slander might influence a result, but it is better than having nothing to work with. The BO usually has to aim pretty well with their abilities (or have good luck) to trick the town.
Better than voting based on "hunches" or "feelings".

[xpon]

(and breva didnt get stolen)

Wait, so she lied about getting stolen? Or is it just a typo?

breva did get stolen on night 1 but not in night 2

@schillok
GIN is in the game.
now i ask you.... did you know i was slandered or not? as far as i know i was the one who provide info and now you turn this all to vote me. you put kleene and tanner name on that list of Pm, now who the one who leaking roles? i dont know what you try to do but you are the one who start this and you will pay with your life when i was lynched because of this!

[Kleene Onigiri]

Schillok has nothing to do with my decision to vote you, xpon :p

[xpon]

HA!. the Detective Boys say they will Identify me today!.

so go ahead.. you can vote me or anything but i will reveal your evilness when i was proven or i was lynched ..

[Stopwatch]

Hmm... if we agree on two people and sort out who's voting who we might get away with a tie 'cause the Org would give themselves away if they don't go along with it. But doesn't APTX affect the votes if they get someone...? Or does no one think they've got enough info for that yet...
Basically, attempting a tie is risky, I think we should wait for a lead for as long as possible.

It could work later in the game, but not at this stage. You will hardly get everyone to vote like you suggest, and a single player forgetting to vote, a BO player "forgetting to vote", a Tequila frighten, poison, arrest, etc. to stop that plan. Random draws are okay. But planing for them... has too many weaknesses.

And, what was the result that made xpon suspicious? If you can ask whoever told you 'bout it to PM me, or you can pass it on if you don't want me to know who discovered it... If it was an interrogation though, isn't Gin in the game? Have any Stakeouters seen any Slanders to confirm his exsistence?

Yeah, a slander might influence a result, but it is better than having nothing to work with. The BO usually has to aim pretty well with their abilities (or have good luck) to trick the town.
Better than voting based on "hunches" or "feelings".

Yup, I can agree with that, though I would point out that nearly everyone (who has those actions) interrogates or investigates xpon very early in the game, last round when I was Akai I found two investigators on Night 1 'cause I investigated them investigating xpon. The BO really doesn't have to be lucky, it's fairly predictable who'll be interrogated/investigated first so they can just Slander them. With so few 'high profile' players in this round it's even more likely for xpon to be interrogated/investigated so they can Slander him. Though it's still possible (quite probable in fact) that xpon is Org, I'm not sure on the probabilities of it. If xpon isn't lynched this phase, then SIers can check BO suspects for Slandering xpon, right?