it wasn't so much that I said it didn't count as it was that I meant that in the end, it wouldn't have mattered if he'd actually become active or not that time because either way his vote would've gotten nullified. Not a point in the argument, just an observation on the gameKleene Onigiri wrote: @ako: you said somewhere that the example holmes for "getting active again" doesn't count because he was aptxed anyway. (thus his vote would have been removed anyway)
But he did get active again.
and you may not repeat it anymore, but I still don't see how getting inactives to vote for themselves does anything to break tie votes or penalize them for inactivity. All it will do is turn a vote like:
Votes for A: B, C, D, E, F
Votes for B: G, H, I
into
Votes for A: B, C, D, E, F
Votes for B: G, H, I
Votes for J: J
Votes for K: K
Votes for L: L
etc, which is little more than a cosmetic change, because very seldomly will people actually be voting to lynch an inactive player beyond the first day.

xpon kinda remember a round where he is sick.. and just pop up 2 phase before end and revealing the last BO

