First impressions

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 4:23 pm

Someone who understands things easily.

Yurikochan · Post by **Yurikochan** » October 10th, 2010, 4:25 pm

Someone who knows I'm not good with codes.

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 4:29 pm

Someone who isn't good with codes. D:

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 4:31 pm

Idem?

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 4:33 pm

Someone who is a bit wrong.
I'm not an expert but I know a decent amount.

Yurikochan · Post by **Yurikochan** » October 10th, 2010, 4:41 pm

Someone who should know I'm getting better though. ^^

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 4:41 pm

RM:
Someone who's probably talking about non-cryptological codes.

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 4:41 pm

Someone who's probably correct.

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 4:45 pm

Someone who used probably. I hope you know what you yourself are talking about...

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 4:49 pm

Someone that should know I'm talking about HTML codes.

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 4:50 pm

Someone who's right, I do know.

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 5:01 pm

Someone who thinks I suck at HTML coding?
Sorry, I'm a bit confused now...

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 5:16 pm

Someone who didn't understand that your reply to my FI
"Someone who's probably talking about non-cryptological codes."
was
"Someone who's probably correct.".
Which is strange - you should know what topic you are actually talking about, so I said:
"Someone who used probably. I hope you know what you yourself are talking about...".
You replied:
"Someone that should know I'm talking about HTML codes.".
As I had known beforehand, I said:
"Someone who's right, I do know.".

So I never thought you suck at HTML or something like that.

Detective Tommy · Post by **Detective Tommy** » October 10th, 2010, 5:17 pm

Someone that should know I don't know the correct definition for the term 'non-cryptological'

Callid · Post by **Callid** » October 10th, 2010, 5:21 pm

Someone who confused me. "non-cryptological" clearly means that the meaning of "code" that is not cryptological is meant. Cause, you know, "code" is also a pretty important term in cryptology.

First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions

Re: First impressions