I guess I'll use it on someone elsePhoenixTears wrote: Yeah except I learn from my mistakes.![]()

I guess I'll use it on someone elsePhoenixTears wrote: Yeah except I learn from my mistakes.![]()
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
I'll add this "PT is slandering me! Don't trust anything in her signature!" :3PhoenixTears wrote: Maybe I should add that to my sig?"Don't trust DT if he says he needs someone to take over his actions for a few phase!"
Or just tell people it. So they'll know your BO.Detective Tommy wrote:I'll add this "PT is slandering me! Don't trust anything in her signature!" :3PhoenixTears wrote: Maybe I should add that to my sig?"Don't trust DT if he says he needs someone to take over his actions for a few phase!"
Conia wrote: Why am I thinking a ferret is an experiment from PT to mix the charm of dogs with the evilness of cats? :V
generally, if you're hoping that the game wouldn't come to actually use your reward, that's an indication that you subconsciously knew you shouldn't have rewarded the reward in the first place. So, note to future GMsConia wrote: Who's winning, who's winning... looks like we have a tie between Sherlock and Akonyl. Someone must leave, there's no other way to fix this... I was hoping this wasn't brought up, but there's some people whose vote is worth DOUBLE, and will hopefully define this.
do not do this, ever, please. Just because you are whichever character you are doesn't mean you should roleplay your character's hatreds towards others as that just makes things super awkward for the people around you (similar to when you blew up at DT that one round and played it off as "chianti hates vermouth so I was RPing" or something) and thus unfun.xpon wrote:I almost use bad words if only conia didnt remind me that you accuse me as your character.
Oi oi, leave my subconcious out of thisAkonyl wrote:generally, if you're hoping that the game wouldn't come to actually use your reward, that's an indication that you subconsciously knew you shouldn't have rewarded the reward in the first place. So, note to future GMsConia wrote: Who's winning, who's winning... looks like we have a tie between Sherlock and Akonyl. Someone must leave, there's no other way to fix this... I was hoping this wasn't brought up, but there's some people whose vote is worth DOUBLE, and will hopefully define this.
It is actually a different matter. I told him that, if accused by anything, to respond with his character and abilities, like claiming another characters/abilities, same style Kleene or Schillok use for defending theirselves.Akonyl wrote:do not do this, ever, please. Just because you are whichever character you are doesn't mean you should roleplay your character's hatreds towards others as that just makes things super awkward for the people around you (similar to when you blew up at DT that one round and played it off as "chianti hates vermouth so I was RPing" or something) and thus unfun.xpon wrote:I almost use bad words if only conia didnt remind me that you accuse me as your character.
future GMs may not make stalker rounds, but the idea of "don't give rewards you'll regret" is an idea that future GMs should keep in mind as well.Conia wrote:Oi oi, leave my subconcious out of thisAkonyl wrote:generally, if you're hoping that the game wouldn't come to actually use your reward, that's an indication that you subconsciously knew you shouldn't have rewarded the reward in the first place. So, note to future GMsConia wrote: Who's winning, who's winning... looks like we have a tie between Sherlock and Akonyl. Someone must leave, there's no other way to fix this... I was hoping this wasn't brought up, but there's some people whose vote is worth DOUBLE, and will hopefully define this.But that's correct. Not that future GMs will have to worry about Task rewarding
![]()
What?xpon wrote: she suspect me. so i help her to stay alive but she wont lynched me.
just like others when they threat the criminal last round
or nom threat kain.
it was called blackmail
Ewww, so it really was like that. You know that because of your drama we had to take the 50% chance to poison Breva (Takagi or Chiba?) instead for the sure-kill on Yurikochan.xpon wrote: she suspect me. so i help her to stay alive but she wont lynched me.
just like others when they threat the criminal last round
or nom threat kain.
it was called blackmail
Yeah, the voting rewards were a double-edged sword. As a BO they were good for us. Would have been even better if we got them later in the game. Also, if Shihokudo had bothered to change her avatar and get the vote reduction during day 3 the BO could have lynched a townie who also didn't participate just with their own votes. I don't think that should happen.Akonyl wrote:future GMs may not make stalker rounds, but the idea of "don't give rewards you'll regret" is an idea that future GMs should keep in mind as well.Conia wrote:Oi oi, leave my subconcious out of thisAkonyl wrote:generally, if you're hoping that the game wouldn't come to actually use your reward, that's an indication that you subconsciously knew you shouldn't have rewarded the reward in the first place. So, note to future GMsConia wrote: Who's winning, who's winning... looks like we have a tie between Sherlock and Akonyl. Someone must leave, there's no other way to fix this... I was hoping this wasn't brought up, but there's some people whose vote is worth DOUBLE, and will hopefully define this.But that's correct. Not that future GMs will have to worry about Task rewarding
![]()
(fun fact: I intentionally sabotaged the "random" dreams in my round during Night 2 so that they gave out hardly any information so that they made as little game impact as possible)
as for the second part: Fair enough, guess I read it incorrectly.
Kogoro always starts drunk :Verased Eri we knew Kogoro would have been drunk
Hm... I wouldn't give every BO a investigationable ability, like s.investigate to pisco and investigate to vodka. Otherwise there will be no use for the Black suitcase soon. Would be better to give them a day ability or a passive ability or a ability that comes with killing instead.Anokata: I like how he is so hard to find out, but has a bad time trying to blend in the town as well. I think he is fine the way he is.
Gin: Very useful. I think that slandering a townie and a BO was a good change to him. Also, his investigate that he can use in addition to it makes him very good for the BO.
Vermouth: Always liked her role. Even with a power that can not help us to identify townies like in this game, the "not BO" interrogation result and everything make her a solid addition.
Pisco: Not sure about him. Obviously, the Bribe ability is great. Erasing is also useful. But otherwise he is... so... not doing anything. Can't we give him a simple, repeatable ability? Like Special Investigate? Or would that make him to close to Kir?
Vodka: We talked about it before. His discombobulation is certainly useful. But somehow it can't really compete with the other BO roles. Maybe we could give him Investigate 2? He is working with Gin all the time, so making him investigate at 40% compared to Gin doesn't feel overpowered. Also, it lessens the dependency of the BO on Gin starting on their side to investigate. The disadvantage is of course that it of course that he could now try to pretend to be a trickster OR an investigator.
Akemi: The stealing is so useful to find out peoples identities if you know a few things about them. Also, the missing scent might be useful. I think she is fine - there is a reason why Calvados covers her so often.
Calvados: Speaking of Calvados - he was not in the game - but I think there was enough testing on him now. And his ability turned out alright. Maybe we could allow him to become a bit more flexible - by not forcing him to decide on someone to cover during the day? So he can decide during the night who he wants to cover. Of course we will leave the restriction that he can only use ONE ability of the copied ally. The main disadvantage: It makes BO nights even more complicated. More options means more chaos.
Korn: Snipers are good. Especially since they now get through healing. Still, Korns stake-out feels so inferior to Chiantis observe. I think something has to be done about Korn to not make wish the BO they had Chinati in almost any situation. Not sure what though.