Mafia - Round 11 (Game Over: BO Wins)

[Grawwbear]

NOBODY TRUST DETECTIVE TOMMY!!!!! HE IS BO TRYING TO DECEIVE US, MY INTERROGATION RESULT WAS: BO. LYNCH HIM INSTEAD!!!This is why yesterday I said that Night 4´s action would determine if I trusted him or not, I wanted to verify if he was BO or townie. BE ON THIS ONE WITH ME!!!

The plot thickens.

[Kleene Onigiri]

I showed you the PM that Pofa accidentally sent me. He said the following, which proves the remaining BO. I devised a plan that can assure a win, IF it is followed!

Spoiler: Pofa's PM that she sent me...

This was sent to me, blurf, and Laurell. Kleene, maybe you should cast some doubt on Holmes's guilt but be careful. And Tommy is the only investigator left (right)? So he can either interrogate or investigate tonight.

I think who we kill depends on how sure we are about a town lynch or tie tomorrow. Eisuke is still dangerous. If we kill him (5:4) and we're sure about being able to sway one person to not vote BO tomorrow (thus resulting in a town death or tie), there will be nothing to stop us from killing again tomorrow night and we'll stalemate the next day. It won't matter who Sherry/Mitsuhiko follows.

If we're not sure about tomorrow, we should think about killing Yurikochan or nomemory. Tommy is dangerous (I wish we could trick him!), but I don't know if we can achieve a tie if we kill him.

Laurell, since you're on, could you give Kleene or me the power to order a kill for you tonight? Beastly's more likely to be tricked anyway. Unless you'll be on around the deadline.

So Pofa PM'ed me, asking Laurell (Anokata) to give permission to Kleene or Pofa (her) to give orders. Proven Kleene, Pofa and Laurell are remaining BO. Also, she said that Beastly might get tricked by Eisuke tonight. So he's also BO.

So here is the plan.

Day 4: LYNCH LAURELL
Day 5: LYNCH POFA
Day 6: LYNCH BEASTLY
Day 7: LYNCH KLEENE

I want Kleene to die last because she infiltrated my alliance and got everyone killed!
-edit- Or the BO can just give up and kill themselves. There really is no way to lie your way out of this

I laughed when I saw what the PM I got from pofa said too... it was addressed to me, Tommy, and Laurell... I thought it was some ally posting some info (that I should read AFTER I read the thread. Then I read it again after Tommy reposted it through PM.

I don't know what to say to that... Anyways, it's not like it's day time, so it's not going to influence Night 4's outcome (that BO will be killing someone and not the town killing the BO) that much.

POSTING THIS ONE LAST TIME BEFORE I DIE!!! ALL TOWN, WIN THIS NOW!!!

- In case you can't play for a number of phases, you can make a list of actions (Day 2: Vote for Akonyl Night 3: Slander Kleene etc.) If you have allies from the beginning (BO, Lover, DB's or friends) you can give them the command over your character for those phases only by PMing the GM that your ally/allies can submit actions for you for those phases.  If the GM notices that you have not come online for a number of days without such a PM (for example in the case of natural disaster, death, etc.), it is up to the GM's discretion what happens to your character.

I am sending a PM to EVERYONE, town and BO to tell them to copy and paste the following actions and send them to Abs.
This way, we prevent any tie or no voting. And also, in case a town can't come online that night/day, the BO member is already lynched. I planned this out pretty well.

So, please send these actions to Abs. We can win right now. And if every town does this, we ALREADY WON!

Day 4: LYNCH LAURELL
Day 5: LYNCH POFA
Day 6: LYNCH BEASTLY
Day 7: LYNCH KLEENE

If you really need to see this again that proves Pofa, Kleene, Laurell and BEastly are BO... HERE!

I agree with Holmes. Tommy is acting suspicious.

And that PM could be a fake created by Tommy. And faking a screenshot isn't hard either.
And seriously. Who would PM someone wrongly with ALL info on BO? In case pofa really did PM you this, don't you think this is strange?
Blurf said, that this was send to Blurf, Tommy and Laurell? Why Laurell? Laurell is supposed to be BO according to pofas pm. Why wasn't it PMed to the rest of the supposed BO's then too? But it was just Laurell.

Next strange thing: Tommy was already planing to vote for people on a night phase. And he changed the lynching targets randomly. First Holmes and then Beastly. If he did that in order for people that could be away (like Kain?) and to make a vote order ahead, why changing it from Holmes to Beastly suddenly?
For me this sounded more like Tommy trying to split the town-votes apart.

Another thing. Laurell and Beastly are supposed to be BO. Well, they are pretty inactive in this round and didn't talk much in the thread. So of course it's easy to blame them since they can't defend themselves...

Next point, Tommy knew the roles from xpon, commi and phoenix too. I did too and don't deny it. I told some people that I knew the roles. But I'll get all the blame now? And strangely, I'm the last to be lynched?
Lynching order is Laurell, pofa, beastly, Kleene. So why not pofa first, who is supposed to have PMed that Pm. And if not pofa, why not me who is being blamed by Tommy?
Why Laurell, who didn't do much and was away (and also said so). Targeting the one who can't defend themself good first?

And a important point. Holmes was blamed by Tommy. Now he isn't a BO. in the PM anymore. And Holmes has prove that Tommy is BO. So, do you want to say Holmes is lying?

Also, why were there just 3 APTX deaths? With 5-7 BO's, there should be always 4 APTX available for the BO. Did they miss the APTX on me? Or do they still have 1 APTX reserved?

---

Ps: I finally have more time because I wrote almost all tests! yay! XD

[Akonyl]

now I just wanna know what the text abs edited out said D:

[nomemory]

now I just wanna know what the text abs edited out said D:

I saw it but I can't remember =(

[Holmes]

[
Ps: I finally have more time because I wrote almost all tests! yay! XD

After the holidays I have like, 10 tests in a row. xD Lucky you.

Just a reminder, my interrogation of DT was BO, so lynch him!!!

[Laurell]

Uhm... Why is my name included in the message?

[Kleene Onigiri]

[
Ps: I finally have more time because I wrote almost all tests! yay! XD

After the holidays I have like, 10 tests in a row. xD Lucky you.

Just a reminder, my interrogation of DT was BO, so lynch him!!!

Holy cow, 10 tests D:

Well, still have 1 test next week (but it's easy pie). And need to write a document too D: So not total free yet XD
But I can spaaaaaaaaaaaaam again, fufufu~

now I just wanna know what the text abs edited out said D:

I saw it but I can't remember =(

I'm not sure if this is a pun from you or not now XD

[Holmes]

Uhm... Why is my name included in the message?

Det. Tommy is BO, and is trying to make town lynch between ourselves claiming a BO PM was sent to him with the members left. So if you´re town, lynch Det. Tommy, my interrogation proved it. Obviously, I hope you´re not the scapegoat of the BO as if people trusted DT and lynched you and you were BO, DT would be the good guy. Although, now that I proved he is BO ... and people followed me and lynch him ... well, he´s nowhere to run.

Anyway, now I´m thinking a probable scenario that I wouldn´t like it to happen: if there is a Gin and Slandered me, and DT was not BO he would appear BO, and the BO member gave him the PM on purpose so that an interrogator (me) would interrogate him and think he was BO trying to trick the town. This case, I  think is less probable, SO

In conclusion, I´ll still lynch DT.

[Laurell]

Uhm... Why is my name included in the message?

Det. Tommy is BO, and is trying to make town lynch between ourselves claiming a BO PM was sent to him with the members left. So if you´re town, lynch Det. Tommy, my interrogation proved it. Obviously, I hope you´re not the scapegoat of the BO as if people trusted DT and lynched you and you were BO, DT would be the good guy. Although, now that I proved he is BO ... and people followed me and lynch him ... well, he´s nowhere to run.

Anyway, now I´m thinking a probable scenario that I wouldn´t like it to happen: if there is a Gin and Slandered me, and DT was not BO he would appear BO, and the BO member gave him the PM on purpose so that an interrogator (me) would interrogate him and think he was BO trying to trick the town. This case, I  think is less probable, SO

In conclusion, I´ll still lynch DT.

Well, for including my name in that message, I guess I have no choice but to follow what you said, since you've mentioned your interrogation proves it.

[Schillok]

@Holmes: Slandering you would not do anything. It is not the target of slandering who gets the opposite results, it is the player interrogating the slandered player who does.

Example: I am Hakuba (again). Abs is Gin. Akonyl is Shinichi.

If Abs slanders Akonyl and I interrogate Akonyl, I would get the result "BO". However if Akonyl interrogates me, he will get "not BO as an answer". And if either of us interrogates Gin we would both get the result "BO".

[Holmes]

Uhm... Why is my name included in the message?

Det. Tommy is BO, and is trying to make town lynch between ourselves claiming a BO PM was sent to him with the members left. So if you´re town, lynch Det. Tommy, my interrogation proved it. Obviously, I hope you´re not the scapegoat of the BO as if people trusted DT and lynched you and you were BO, DT would be the good guy. Although, now that I proved he is BO ... and people followed me and lynch him ... well, he´s nowhere to run.

Anyway, now I´m thinking a probable scenario that I wouldn´t like it to happen: if there is a Gin and Slandered me, and DT was not BO he would appear BO, and the BO member gave him the PM on purpose so that an interrogator (me) would interrogate him and think he was BO trying to trick the town. This case, I  think is less probable, SO

In conclusion, I´ll still lynch DT.

Well, for including my name in that message, I guess I have no choice but to follow what you said, since you've mentioned your interrogation proves it.

Good choice. Thanks.

[Holmes]

@Holmes: Slandering you would not do anything. It is not the target of slandering who gets the opposite results, it is the player interrogating the slandered player who does.

Example: I am Hakuba (again). Abs is Gin. Akonyl is Shinichi.

If Abs slanders Akonyl and I interrogate Akonyl, I would get the result "BO". However if Akonyl interrogates me, he will get "not BO as an answer". And if either of us interrogates Gin we would both get the result "BO".

Ok, thanks, so in the second scenario DT could have beem slandered. But I´d rather not think that scenario, I´ll still lynch DT.

[PT]

Sorry, had to edit this because it sounded like a deduction from a dead person  - Abs.

Haha, woops. I didn't even think about it sounding that way. I'll be more careful what I say next time.

[Commi-Ninja]

now I just wanna know what the text abs edited out said D:

Me too.

[Detective Tommy]

NOBODY TRUST DETECTIVE TOMMY!!!!! HE IS BO TRYING TO DECEIVE US, MY INTERROGATION RESULT WAS: BO. LYNCH HIM INSTEAD!!!This is why yesterday I said that Night 4´s action would determine if I trusted him or not, I wanted to verify if he was BO or townie. BE ON THIS ONE WITH ME!!!

You're so stupid. Ever heard of being slandered? Wow, you're dumb.
I posted what Pofa sent me.

I don't understand. If you were BO, you would follow my plan and Bo could have won.
But if you're town, then you would trust me.

Whatever, you're either deceiving or just an epic fail right now.