Togop wrote:
As for today, we need a discussion. In the hopes of starting some, I'll get a little radical and announce that Ansai is not on my list. I believe that this won't help the spy too much. The choice also aims to involve inactives (Ansai) more.
I don’t agree with your choice of action. There are other ways to start a discussion and you’re setting a bad example for other players.
Jd- wrote:
As for the return of the no-kill, I am leaning toward genuine inactivity this time, which limits our suspects considerably. But, it could be a ploy all the same. It's also possible they were simply busy during Prep and couldn't get an Order to their Informants in time. Nonetheless, I have a lead we can try out if Ansai doesn't work out.
Why? Real inactivity isn’t any more likely than a bluff, imo.
Jd- wrote:It is indeed true that the Spy and Informant benefit from us eliminating Detective suspects. However, we should discuss a few possibilities until we arrive at the best one.
And we can’t discuss possible spy suspects without eliminating detective suspects why, exactly? I don’t follow your logic here ...
Jd- wrote:I think this is a good place to start for discussion.
Stopwatch
miakakiri
PhantomWriter
RoboG55
Ansai
Trickster
Some of them have already mentioned why they didn't vote, but what about the others? I was actually pretty surprised to see Stopwatch not vote, but maybe she felt not voting was fine since a tie was being arranged.
Miakakiri, PhantomWriter and RoboG55 all spoke up before your post. Stopwatch self-voted, but was really active before that, so I don’t know why you put her on that list. If she were the spy, I’m pretty sure she wouldn’t have forgotten to kill and, given that there was a tie initiative going on, self-voting was in agreement with the plan and really rather safe. Ansai also spoke up after your post, which makes Trickster the only person who hasn’t said anything yet.
So:
Trickster! Come join the discussion!
PhantomWriter wrote:
Ansai's also on my list. And the inconsistency, presuming everyone's telling the truth about their lists, means that Ansai's not the detective. Which then narrows down the person to civilian, spy, or informant. That information more helps the spy and informant instead of civilians and detective.
Indeed! I quite agree, which is why I will never mention whether or not someone is on my list, and I hope other people will do the same.
Togop wrote:
Well, revealing that Ansai is not the detective helps everyone who has him on their list narrow down the detective further. Thus while we certainly don't want to reveal a a bunch of people who are not the detective, I figured one is probably fine.
I really wish people would stop playing bingo with their lists, but I guess I’m asking too much there. This is going to end badly, methinks.
Jd- wrote:It would be pretty genius of Togop as the Informant or Spy to go with that list initiative, now that I think about it. Not saying he's either, just a thought.
Possible.
Jd- wrote:
Yuri seems civilian-like to me, if only due to volunteering as a subject to be voted as one of the two tie targets before. Myself and Conan-chandesune were the other outright volunteers, and for the most part, you would expect those putting themselves on the line for that to be civilians. That's why I'd push myself as someone to not random-vote at all at this point, given that I put myself on the line and could have very easily been arrested haphazardly (as we've just seen is a very real possibility). Due to the risk involved, for now, I say we ditch the tie votes.
Except if the spy/informant did exactly that to
seem Civilian, a possibility I’m quite frankly considering not too unlikely. There’s a risk, yes, but how much easier the game would be after you’ve ‘proven’ yourself to be Civilian.
Jd- wrote:
I actually... don't think it's the best strategy to go for. But, I do think there's one thing we can gain from it. That thing is something I won't mention (should this go through) until the next phase, as I'm not entirely sure who most benefits. It's tangentially related to the conundrum I mentioned earlier during Prep Phase and I'm still a little undecided on how exactly to disseminate that information without giving the Spy an advantage going forward.
I’d still like to know your reasons for not only going with the tie vote, but making sure it happened with volunteers. You didn’t give any reasons yesterday after all.