Detective Tommy wrote:
No Kleene, I'm only here to get BO.
You state "DT is randomly accusing me
too" Notice the emphasis on too? Well, I'm not randomly accusing miikosan. I interrogated her and got NOT BO. But was slandered so should be BO

Why associate yourself with her :V Unless you're trying to help her or something..
@Yurikochan, she didn't "turn me" against you. She just PM'd me that I shouldn't trust you 100% yet. Which is similar I guess. :V
WAAAAAAAAAAAIT a secound. So you wanna go on words now? You made more mistakes than me mister~
I tend to use too in too many cases where it doesn't fit. Since my grammatic isn't so good. (and I also should use "," afaik anyway with too :V)
So, in the end it was you who interrogated her? :x Since you accuse me, I can't trust you. Don't blame me for that.
Also, what DT said. DT asked me if he can trust Yurikochan for
100% on day 2 afaik. I said I can't say he can trust her for 100%, since I didn't investigate if she stole from me or if she is disguised. So I couldn't know for 100% if she's town or not. But I said I trust her, since someone did steal a Gem from me like I asked Yurikochan to do that.
I investigated if Yurikochan would get tricked that night instead, LIKE YURIKOCHAN WANTED ME TO.
Thanks for clearing that up~
So, if I don#t say I trust someone 100%, although I don't have any means to claim that, I'm automatically distrusting/turning someone against someone? What's with this great logic now?
Excuse me, but I will never ever say I trust someone 100% if I don't have the means to that. And if there is also the tiniest possibility, that that person could still eb a lover or BO or whatever.